SirSaxa
Silver Hoya (over 500 posts)
Posts: 747
|
Post by SirSaxa on Dec 20, 2009 8:08:26 GMT -5
OK, so we lost a game. We beat two ranked teams the week before.
And no one player lost the game for us yesterday, the entire team lost it together. Everyone turned the ball over, missed FTs, missed front end of 1 & 1 FTs, lost their man on D, missed Threes, etc.
On the plus side, the team fought back like crazy at the end and Julian continues to be a force underneath. He and Greg together give us FAR better inside play at both ends of the court than we had last year.
OK, ok, add me to the list of fans who would like to see Vee getting a few minutes.
Otherwise, the team has looked good over it's 9 game run so far. Top 25.
Are we ready for the BE? We'll find out. IMHO, yes, we are.
|
|
lichoya68
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
OK YOUNGINS ARE HERE AND ARE VERY VERY GOOD cant wait GO HOYAS
Posts: 17,438
|
Post by lichoya68 on Dec 20, 2009 8:19:58 GMT -5
good perspective sir saxa good perspective go hoyas
|
|
skyhoya
Golden Hoya (over 1000 posts)
Posts: 2,496
|
Post by skyhoya on Dec 20, 2009 8:23:53 GMT -5
no one wants to step up and be the the team leader yet
|
|
|
Post by jld54 on Dec 20, 2009 9:27:12 GMT -5
In my view this game exposed our team weakness -- lack of depth. This team has a six-man rotation, with the sixth man a freshman. If even 2 starters are having an off game we do not have the depth to overcome this. We did fine against Butler and Washington because at least 4 of the top six had good games. But this team has no one who can come off the bench for an offensive or defensive spark, or just to changes things up.
The lack of depth also precludes an aggressive defense to change momentum, e.g., a press or half-court trapping defense, because of foul/fatigue issues. This may be where losing transfers the past few seasons hurts us -- not that the actual players like Macklin or Rivers hurts us -- they both are so-so players, but not having players in those roles is a problem.
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 30,540
|
Post by DanMcQ on Dec 20, 2009 9:52:08 GMT -5
That may be true, but there are at least three players on the bench that appear capable of contributing to the rotation but who totalled only 8 minutes between them last night (with one not getting in the game). I'm all for showing confidence in your starters by letting them work through it but the only way to develop that rotation is to actually play the bench players.
|
|
GPHoya
Bulldog (over 250 posts)
Posts: 466
|
Post by GPHoya on Dec 20, 2009 10:16:47 GMT -5
ODU played better against us than Washington, Butler or Temple. Clark had his first off game. A lot of unforced turnovers in a limited possession game. Vaughn's two fouls in first half kept us from sitting Greg which needed to happen. Monroe's defensive fundamentals are horrible. His shot selection inside is poor. Wright remains in a deep funk. I was not that impressed by our wins because our opponents had not played well against us and are generally over-rated. Our 2-3 zone is awful. No one can count on being 22 for 22 from the foul line. 16 for 22 would be solid, so adding a missed front end, sub-standard foul shooting is about a three point factor. That said, the foul line disparity would have us howling about the home court if we were on the other side of it.
I am not sure that I buy this as a trap game or a game where we didn't try. With a lively home crowd in a tiny gym with helpful officiating, we were lucky to only lose by four. ODU played very well and we played a little below our normal game based on the four I have seen on television and the Butler game I saw in person. We are nowhere near the 11th best team in the country and will need to work hard to be one of the eight best in our conference. A three game losing streak to end 2009 is not out of the question. Having been punched in the eye, we need to see whether our response from this team is going to be better than last year's team. If not, pitchers and catchers will need to report early.
Finally, the real culprit is Johnny Jones for posting the first loss thread. Stay away from the kool-aid.
|
|
hoyaboy1
Golden Hoya (over 1000 posts)
Posts: 1,346
|
Post by hoyaboy1 on Dec 20, 2009 10:25:29 GMT -5
Clark was getting killed on the perimiter all game. ODU's guards were penetrating almost at will, and Clark couldn't even slow them down. On the other end, our guards either wouldn't or couldn't penetrate - Clark didn't even try (he hasn't all year, really), and Wright only tried once or twice with limited success. Freeman is our best at getting to the basket, but he usually only tries 2-3 times a game as well. I don't think we are nearly strong enough at passing, shooting, post play, etc. to completely ignore penetration.
|
|
GUJook97
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 5,445
|
Post by GUJook97 on Dec 20, 2009 10:59:55 GMT -5
We played very well against Washington, so I dont know how you can say we have not impressed and our overrated. We played poorly last night and ODU played very well. It happens, but one loss doesnt mean we are all of a sudden going to struggle to beat Harvard and SJU, and will have to fight just to finish in the top 10 of our conference. We are much better than those teams. We've deserved to win every game we won, and we deserved to lose last night. I hope this is a wake up call.
We've all said it before, but the book against us is and always will be play tough defense and stretch out possessions. Not a surprise that Temple and ODU were our toughest games. We dont create in transition well enough, dont have an explosive offense. Our strategy is to run every possession for the optimal shot, that is why we are always ranked so high in Pomeroy. Our offensive efficiency is high because the JTIII is to optimize possession.
|
|
|
Post by tigerbake on Dec 20, 2009 11:40:05 GMT -5
Here is what I take from the ODU game.
- MOre than the bad stuff I take from this game that Julian has a ton of fight in him, is the real deal and makes a huge difference on the floor..going to be a force this year
- That right handed shot by GM was UGLY...so as much as I want to see the right maybe it isn't there yet
- More disappointed with guards passing than anything else they did
- settled for too many jumpers as opposed to the other couple of games
I still think we have a great team and will rebound and be ready for the BE...Go hoyas
|
|
|
Post by hoyawoodhoopster on Dec 20, 2009 12:21:11 GMT -5
It seems to me -- and I was stuck "watching" the snow-blown MASN coverage, so take this with a salt mine -- that this was as much, if not more, a mental as a physical loss. True, Wright was off his game for a good bit of the night, Clark was often lost on defense, and Greg's right (make that wrong) hand was ugly, but this team just didn't seem ready to play, right from the tip-off. Even on TV, the lack of energy was palpable. The turn-overs, which admittedly have plagued us in the past, have generally involved trying to make a play, force a drive or ball into the paint, whatever. They were not always, but frequently, the product of intensity. Last night's TO's too often looked like the product of sleep-walking. That, like free-throw shooting, tells me that concentration and preparation were issues. That's bad, but fixable. And I think that Coach will fix it.
A couple of other observations re prior posts. As a left coaster who was at the game here in California last week, I have to disagree with both the notion that Washington isn't pretty damn good, or that we didn't play well against them. See my post-game musings of last week. (It may be worth remembering that UW is still picked to win the (admittedly down) PAC 10, and was picked number 9 in the country by SI pre-season). Second, the bench scoring, which has been mentioned by a number of prior posters, IS a big problem (and was one of the few real low points in the Washington win); it is likely to be bigger issue as the grind of the BE season sets in. Finally, I like Mark Tillmon, but he's really not much help as an analyst. Grammatical "fingernails on the chalkboard" commentary aside, he offers no real insight, is an apostle of the obvious, and is maddeningly repetitive. I'm glad to see him have a chance on MASN, but he's going to have to improve in all of these areas to have any prospect of moving up the sportscaster ladder.
|
|
OldHoyafan
Golden Hoya (over 1000 posts)
Posts: 1,387
|
Post by OldHoyafan on Dec 20, 2009 12:23:55 GMT -5
That may be true, but there are at least three players on the bench that appear capable of contributing to the rotation but who totalled only 8 minutes between them last night (with one not getting in the game). I'm all for showing confidence in your starters by letting them work through it but the only way to develop that rotation is to actually play the bench players. Dan, Ihave to agree with you here. JT3 is a cerebral guy who wants his players to be able to figure it out and make the adjustments to their game in order to make the offense work. But yhe college game is 70% emotional. Some days your starting five as a group is just flat and don't have the emotional fire needed to beat a solid team, for whatever reasons; fatigue from travel, exam week, snow storm, having not had time or money to buy family and girlfriend a Christmas gift, etc. When the Hoyas went down by 18 points in the first half, it was time to pull all starters and put a fresh five in. Give the bench a chance to show you that they can hold their own,and maybe energize the starters to show the same emotion the subs had with the opportunity to play. I am ok with a rotation of 6-7 players when they are playing well, but not when they are collectively laying an egg like yesterday.
|
|
Nevada Hoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 18,429
|
Post by Nevada Hoya on Dec 20, 2009 12:25:47 GMT -5
The win against UW looked good yesterday as the Huskies killed former 25th ranked team the Portland Pilots. Of course, since the Hoyas and UP (to some degree, because it is my son's alma mater) are my favorite teams, yesterday was a washout, basketball-wise.
|
|
hoyaalf
Silver Hoya (over 500 posts)
I like what your doing very much. Why squirrel hate me?
Posts: 688
|
Post by hoyaalf on Dec 20, 2009 13:38:14 GMT -5
Shut it down; move on.
|
|
tashoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 12,320
|
Post by tashoya on Dec 20, 2009 13:41:36 GMT -5
As someone else mentioned somewhere along these posts, I found it interesting too that Jerrelle was subbed in before Henry this game. I think we're gonna see more of that or, at the least, Henry and Jerrelle splitting minutes.
I think Vee's going to see more time as well and our depth (and hopefully our turnover rate) will not be major issues in a month. Love this team and I'm almost glad in a way that we took a bad loss. You can always get more out of a loss than a win and hopefully we do that. Bring on Harvard. Time to $%*! some smaaat kids! Hoya Saxa.
|
|
SFHoya99
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 17,743
|
Post by SFHoya99 on Dec 20, 2009 13:52:10 GMT -5
The offense has taken a beating, and it was subpar, but actually relative to our play and ODUs play this season, I think the defense may have been worse. Either way, it was hardly good.
In the first half it was just poor. In the second half, it seemed like the D got better but they got hot. Course, I only saw 1/3rd of the second half, it seemed.
|
|
Boz
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
123 Fireballs!
Posts: 10,355
|
Post by Boz on Dec 20, 2009 14:00:07 GMT -5
I'm glad to see all the usual suspects out in force, who only post on this board when we lose, and do so with some perverse annoying glee.
I will take the other road and follow the advice of HoyaSinceBirth. Start booking reservations for Indy!!!!
Oh, and please beat the crap out of Harvard.
Go Hoyas! I've already erased my recording of last night's awful events.
|
|
Gold Hoya
Golden Hoya (over 1000 posts)
Posts: 1,578
|
Post by Gold Hoya on Dec 20, 2009 14:16:59 GMT -5
When the Hoyas went down by 18 points in the first half, it was time to pull all starters and put a fresh five in. Give the bench a chance to show you that they can hold their own,and maybe energize the starters to show the same emotion the subs had with the opportunity to play. Remember that JTIII did this in the home game vs. Cinci last year. The bench players brought energy, stopped the bleeding, etc ... and GU still lost the game.
|
|
lichoya68
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
OK YOUNGINS ARE HERE AND ARE VERY VERY GOOD cant wait GO HOYAS
Posts: 17,438
|
Post by lichoya68 on Dec 20, 2009 14:24:31 GMT -5
we were lazy and sloopy and not hustling till we were too far behind and too late to pull it out good energy at the end but just not enough to make up for rest of the game go hoyas COME OUT STRONG VS. HARVARD
|
|
calhoya
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 4,352
Member is Online
|
Post by calhoya on Dec 20, 2009 15:12:22 GMT -5
Ugly game--wish I had saved the time, but let's wait until we see a trend before we all fly into a panic over a loss to a decent team right after finals. Not that there aren't some things to worry about based upon the first 9 games, but one of them is not defense. This is the first time this year that the team has played bad defense for the greater part of the game. One thing to worry about is the free throw shooting by Monroe. Another would be Vaughn's tendency to pick up cheap fouls. Finally, and I know I started a thread on him last week, but Wright has got to find some consistency. His offensive game has disappeared. He does not seem to have an outside shot. As for the bench, it is not a strength yet and never will be with a very short rotation. Need to see some real minutes for Sims, Jerelle and Vee if they are ever going to help this year.
|
|
skyhoya
Golden Hoya (over 1000 posts)
Posts: 2,496
|
Post by skyhoya on Dec 20, 2009 15:17:56 GMT -5
We need to press in the first half and put Vee in for 5 minutes to lead it. We also need to study a little more game tape. They knew when we were going to pass and took advantage of it.
|
|