Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,689
|
A New Low
Sept 19, 2018 4:36:00 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Elvado on Sept 19, 2018 4:36:00 GMT -5
So now Dr Ford needs a full FBI investigation before she will testify.
Why? Will they tell her what happened?
Ridiculous. She knows what she knows.
Isn’t it convenient that her need for a full FBI investigation dovetails with the Democrat party’s desire to delay this vote?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2018 7:36:04 GMT -5
So now Dr Ford needs a full FBI investigation before she will testify. Why? Will they tell her what happened? Ridiculous. She knows what she knows. Isn’t it convenient that her need for a full FBI investigation dovetails with the Democrat party’s desire to delay this vote? I am shocked (SHOCKED!) to learn that there are POLITICS happening in this establishment! Watching Republicans get their panties bunched because Democrats might be playing dirty is...something.
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,689
|
A New Low
Sept 19, 2018 7:44:29 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Elvado on Sept 19, 2018 7:44:29 GMT -5
So now Dr Ford needs a full FBI investigation before she will testify. Why? Will they tell her what happened? Ridiculous. She knows what she knows. Isn’t it convenient that her need for a full FBI investigation dovetails with the Democrat party’s desire to delay this vote? I am shocked (SHOCKED!) to learn that there are POLITICS happening in this establishment! Watching Republicans get their panties bunched because Democrats might be playing dirty is...something. I really think the Republicans are jealous because the Democrats donor so much better.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2018 8:34:16 GMT -5
Where was this need to move as quickly as possible when Merrick Garland was nominated?? I believe that seat stayed open for over 400 days...
The only reason R's don't want that to happen is because they just want to he said she said this and quickly dismiss it.. The FBI could interview her witnesses, and Kavanaugh's friend, shouldn't take that long.
The bar to be a Supreme Court Justice should be ridiculously high. It’s a lifetime appointment and there are thousands of other qualified lawyers and judges out there...
While we wait, YOU GUYS COULD RELEASE HIS FULL RECORD ALSO....
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,689
|
A New Low
Sept 19, 2018 8:40:41 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Elvado on Sept 19, 2018 8:40:41 GMT -5
Where was this need to move as quickly as possible when Merrick Garland was nominated?? I believe that seat stayed open for over 400 days... The only reason R's don't want that to happen is because they just want to he said she said this and quickly dismiss it.. The FBI could interview her witnesses, and Kavanaugh's friend, shouldn't take that long. The bar to be a Supreme Court Justice should be ridiculously high. It’s a lifetime appointment and there are thousands of other qualified lawyers and judges out there... While we wait, YOU GUYS COULD RELEASE HIS FULL RECORD ALSO.... A beer at the BET says she never takes the stand... You on?
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,477
|
Post by TC on Sept 19, 2018 8:46:32 GMT -5
A beer at the BET says she never takes the stand... You on? "Hey guys, I bet you my party can threaten, intimidate, and generally blackmail this lady into not testifying!" What is this, Fantasy Mob Government?
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,689
|
A New Low
Sept 19, 2018 8:49:32 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Elvado on Sept 19, 2018 8:49:32 GMT -5
A beer at the BET says she never takes the stand... You on? "Hey guys, I bet you my party can threaten, intimidate, and generally blackmail this lady into not testifying!" What is this, Fantasy Mob Government? Why would she need the FBI to investigate what she experienced before she relates that via her testimony? Please enlighten me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2018 8:52:10 GMT -5
Where was this need to move as quickly as possible when Merrick Garland was nominated?? I believe that seat stayed open for over 400 days... The only reason R's don't want that to happen is because they just want to he said she said this and quickly dismiss it.. The FBI could interview her witnesses, and Kavanaugh's friend, shouldn't take that long. The bar to be a Supreme Court Justice should be ridiculously high. It’s a lifetime appointment and there are thousands of other qualified lawyers and judges out there... While we wait, YOU GUYS COULD RELEASE HIS FULL RECORD ALSO.... A beer at the BET says she never takes the stand... You on? Looks like Republicans are trying to make that happen since they set the hearing, determined how it would work without consulting her, and are basically like -take it or leave it... Again, you're basically calling her a liar, but do you think it's appropriate to make her do that? During the delay Republicans could take the time to release the rest of Kavanaugh's record. I believe 90% is still off the table for some reason..
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,477
|
Post by TC on Sept 19, 2018 8:52:40 GMT -5
Why would she need the FBI to investigate what she experienced before she relates that via her testimony? Please enlighten me. The FBI does actual investigations and interviews, Senate testimony is a show. Why wouldn't you want an actual investigation, unless you want to hide the truth?
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,689
|
A New Low
Sept 19, 2018 8:57:57 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Elvado on Sept 19, 2018 8:57:57 GMT -5
So maybe they could tell her when and where this assault took place, which she does not know.
They could also help her out with 4 assailants vs 2.
Either way, she can tell what she knows now.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2018 9:12:34 GMT -5
Calm down dude, there's no rush....
Whispers: The reason Anita Hill was called to testify is because her FBI interview was leaked by someone.
Whispers: After the fact, Bush had the FBI take another look into Hill's allegations in 91 and had them interview Thomas and Hill...
OT: Evidence supports the fact that Anita Hill was telling the truth even though Republicans love to say otherwise.
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,689
|
A New Low
Sept 19, 2018 9:20:18 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Elvado on Sept 19, 2018 9:20:18 GMT -5
Calm down dude, there's no rush.... Whispers: The reason Anita Hill was called to testify is because her FBI interview was leaked by someone. Whispers: After the fact, Bush had the FBI take another look into Hill's allegations in 91 and had them interview Thomas and Hill... OT: Evidence supports the fact that Anita Hill was telling the truth even though Republicans love to say otherwise. She knows enough right now to have a written a letter (or several) accusing this man of attempted rape so severe that she thought she would die. What does she need to learn from the FBI. Hold the vote in 6 months. I for one don’t care but she had enough to accuse him so let’s hear from her now. Then let the FBI investigate why she has to say. Do we have a bet?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2018 9:24:37 GMT -5
Calm down dude, there's no rush.... Whispers: The reason Anita Hill was called to testify is because her FBI interview was leaked by someone. Whispers: After the fact, Bush had the FBI take another look into Hill's allegations in 91 and had them interview Thomas and Hill... OT: Evidence supports the fact that Anita Hill was telling the truth even though Republicans love to say otherwise. She knows enough right now to have a written a letter (or several) accusing this man of attempted rape so severe that she thought she would die. What does she need to learn from the FBI. Hold the vote in 6 months. I for one don’t care but she had enough to accuse him so let’s hear from her now. Then let the FBI investigate why she has to say. Do we have a bet? Calm down Elvado. Kavanaugh or someone else, you guys are going to get a SC justice. Shouldn't you be more concerned about finding out the truth?
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,689
|
A New Low
Sept 19, 2018 9:29:54 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Elvado on Sept 19, 2018 9:29:54 GMT -5
She knows enough right now to have a written a letter (or several) accusing this man of attempted rape so severe that she thought she would die. What does she need to learn from the FBI. Hold the vote in 6 months. I for one don’t care but she had enough to accuse him so let’s hear from her now. Then let the FBI investigate why she has to say. Do we have a bet? Calm down Elvado. Kavanaugh or someone else, you guys are going to get a SC justice. Shouldn't you be more concerned about finding out the truth? So I will take that as a no on the bet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2018 9:37:25 GMT -5
Calm down Elvado. Kavanaugh or someone else, you guys are going to get a SC justice. Shouldn't you be more concerned about finding out the truth? So I will take that as a no on the bet. I don't bet, and I don't drink... So yeah, that's a no. Why does that matter? You're so weird and immature... this is rank character assassination. Unless she agrees to the terms I set, and shows up at the time I've designated, she's a liar! She won't show! Bet me!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2018 9:40:26 GMT -5
All this carrying on and look at the dates in this release... They are 3 days apart...
|
|
ksf42001
Silver Hoya (over 500 posts)
Posts: 901
|
Post by ksf42001 on Sept 19, 2018 10:30:33 GMT -5
Why have the FBI investigate?
Well, they could potentially figure out if/when/where the party took place. That seems like an important thing to figure out. According to Hatch, Kavanagh said he never attended parties like that. That seems like something the FBI could figure out if true or not. The FBI could add a lot of valuable details it seems.
|
|
guru
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 6,652
|
Post by guru on Sept 19, 2018 13:02:31 GMT -5
So I will take that as a no on the bet. I don't bet, and I don't drink... So yeah, that's a no. Why does that matter? You're so weird and immature... this is rank character assassination. Unless she agrees to the terms I set, and shows up at the time I've designated, she's a liar! She won't show! Bet me! What, running out of ideas and then demanding a bet that, when declined, results in peacocking on the board as if that proves something- that’s immature? Oh, wait. If I didn’t know better (and I don’t) I’d say there’s a middle schooler behind the Elvado handle. That’s the level of discourse at which that poster operates.
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,689
|
A New Low
Sept 19, 2018 13:07:01 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Elvado on Sept 19, 2018 13:07:01 GMT -5
I don't bet, and I don't drink... So yeah, that's a no. Why does that matter? You're so weird and immature... Unless she agrees to the terms I set, and shows up at the time I've designated, she's a liar! She won't show! Bet me! What, running out of ideas and then demanding a bet that, when declined, results in peacocking on the board as if that proves something- that’s immature? Oh, wait. If I didn’t know better (and I don’t) I’d say there’s a middle schooler behind the Elvado handle. That’s the level of discourse at which that poster operates. You guys are wonderful. The intolerance for any opinion other than your own is really a joy to behold. Idle curiosity makes me ask the following. Why does Dr Ford need an FBI investigation to relate what she knows took place sometime in the 80’s somewhere in Montgomery County Maryland. She either knows or she doesn’t. Is she waiting for the FBI to give her the details of this encounter?
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 19,140
|
Post by SSHoya on Sept 19, 2018 13:41:08 GMT -5
Why have the FBI investigate? Well, they could potentially figure out if/when/where the party took place. That seems like an important thing to figure out. According to Hatch, Kavanagh said he never attended parties like that. That seems like something the FBI could figure out if true or not. The FBI could add a lot of valuable details it seems. This is why -- a potential witness who claims to have heard about it (hearsay) at the time. The FBI then asks this individual who else she knows who may have heard about it and attempt to track down the source. It's basic investigation. If, for example, a thorough investigation turns up someone who remembers a party where Kavanaugh was drunk etc. or a house that matches the bare description given by the alleged victim, it may tend to corroborate her story. Difficult, yes but not impossible. Re-interview Kavanaugh about his drinking habits during high school, get evidence from his classmates (other than Mark Judge who will not cooperate) about the drinking habits of his cohorts and their social activities. It may all be inconclusive but is it not worth the effort? Trump's claim that the FBI doesn't do this sort of thing is a blatant lie. I've been through 6 full field background investigations for TS/SCI by the FBI in which I've been interviewed every single time afterward, including questions about adverse information reported about me (yes I've had my share of youthful indiscretions usually involving alcohol consumption). WASHINGTON — A former schoolmate of Brett Kavanaugh's accuser wrote a Facebook post saying she recalls hearing about the alleged assault incident involving the future Supreme Court nominee, though she says she has no first-hand information to corroborate the accuser's claims. www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/accuser-s-schoolmate-says-she-recalls-hearing-alleged-kavanaugh-incident-n911111
|
|