Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2018 12:01:34 GMT -5
Appointees have 30 days to file their financial disclosures once assuming the position. Whitaker has been working at DOJ since October 2017
Breaking the law for the head of the DOJ...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2018 12:10:05 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2018 13:17:12 GMT -5
Still crying so I guess that means my tough words didn't shut you down. I'll defer to your comments on this message board.. Did they show tolerance? You fundamentally misunderstand the difference between tolerance and acquiescence. I will tolerate your statements all day long; I will not accept them or agree with them, but have a party making them. Difference between Left and right. You guys preach tolerance and practice the converse. Translation: if you don’t tolerate intolerance, then you’re intolerant. In practical terms: the person who calls out racists for being racist is just as bad as the racist, because they’re not tolerant of the racists. What a convenient world the Republican echo chamber has created for itself.
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,686
|
Post by Elvado on Nov 17, 2018 13:19:04 GMT -5
You fundamentally misunderstand the difference between tolerance and acquiescence. I will tolerate your statements all day long; I will not accept them or agree with them, but have a party making them. Difference between Left and right. You guys preach tolerance and practice the converse. Translation: if you don’t tolerate intolerance, then you’re intolerant. In practical terms: the person who calls out racists for being racist is just as bad as the racist, because they’re not tolerant of the racists. What a convenient world the Republican echo chamber has created for itself. It is tolerance that allows people to put up with statements just like that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2018 13:31:34 GMT -5
Next step is I take away the mouse pad from any tolerant who supported a ban on all Muslims entering the United States until we can figure out what's going on.... "take several seats..." I can see why you got offended...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2018 13:32:46 GMT -5
Translation: if you don’t tolerate intolerance, then you’re intolerant. In practical terms: the person who calls out racists for being racist is just as bad as the racist, because they’re not tolerant of the racists. What a convenient world the Republican echo chamber has created for itself. It is tolerance that allows people to put up with statements just like that. And it is intolerance that allows people to continue tolerate racism.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2018 13:41:16 GMT -5
But back to the topic of the thread: will the party of law and order stand up for law and order when indictments start getting unsealed shortly?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2018 10:57:45 GMT -5
The one thing he is consistent on...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2018 7:52:51 GMT -5
Oooh, I shut you down by writing words on a message board. Everybody is too pc Elvado, lighten up snowflake it's the equivalent of saying "pot meet kettle" in slang terminology.... Trump's Muslim Ban you support is an example of? No you did not shut me down. You tried though. Liberals love free speech until they disagree with it at which point it is relabeled as “hate speech” or “intolerance” or any thing else the Left can’t abide. "Liberals love free speech until they disagree with it"
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 19,077
|
Post by SSHoya on Nov 19, 2018 10:40:41 GMT -5
Long and detailed; therefore, probably too complex for any Trump supporters/enablers/sycophants to understand. BLUF: The president, in short, was using a senior Justice Department official to gather intelligence about an ongoing criminal investigation in which he was personally implicated. How was all of this presidential contact with the Justice Department understood in the context of Watergate? Pretty harshly. For example, Article II, paragraph 5, of the House Judiciary Committee’s July 27, 1974, Articles of Impeachment states in part that President Nixon: In disregard of the rule of law, . . . knowingly misused the executive power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Criminal Division, and the Office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, of the Department of Justice, and the Central Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed. www.lawfareblog.com/what-watergate-road-map-reveals-about-improper-contact-between-white-house-and-justice-department
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 19,077
|
Post by SSHoya on Nov 19, 2018 16:55:34 GMT -5
On Monday, Sens. Richard Blumenthal, Sheldon Whitehouse and Mazie K. Hirono filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia asking a federal judge to decide the legality of Matthew Whitaker's service as acting attorney general. The senators argue that Whitaker's appointment is in violation of the Appointments Clause as Whitaker was not confirmed by the U.S. Senate in his prior post. The full complaint is below. www.lawfareblog.com/document-three-senators-challenge-whitaker-appointment-dc-federal-district-court
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,686
|
Post by Elvado on Nov 19, 2018 18:22:47 GMT -5
On Monday, Sens. Richard Blumenthal, Sheldon Whitehouse and Mazie K. Hirono filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia asking a federal judge to decide the legality of Matthew Whitaker's service as acting attorney general. The senators argue that Whitaker's appointment is in violation of the Appointments Clause as Whitaker was not confirmed by the U.S. Senate in his prior post. The full complaint is below. www.lawfareblog.com/document-three-senators-challenge-whitaker-appointment-dc-federal-district-courtIf DaNang Dick says it, it must be true. Did he draft the Complaint while ducking enemy fire?
|
|
njhoya78
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 7,801
|
Post by njhoya78 on Nov 19, 2018 19:03:42 GMT -5
Okay. That's one. Any criticisms of Senators Whitehouse or Hirono that you'd care to share?
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,686
|
Post by Elvado on Nov 19, 2018 19:14:59 GMT -5
Okay. That's one. Any criticisms of Senators Whitehouse or Hirono that you'd care to share? Maxie Hirono is well-documented hypocrite who had nothing to say while Dan Inouye and Bill Clinton harassed (or worse) women.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2018 19:48:05 GMT -5
Okay. That's one. Any criticisms of Senators Whitehouse or Hirono that you'd care to share? Maxie Hirono is well-documented hypocrite who had nothing to say while Dan Inouye and Bill Clinton harassed (or worse) women. Johnny One-Note sings again.
|
|
DFW HOYA
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 5,839
|
Post by DFW HOYA on Nov 19, 2018 19:49:46 GMT -5
Maxie Hirono is well-documented hypocrite who had nothing to say while Dan Inouye and Bill Clinton harassed (or worse) women. The claim about Sen. Inouye was in 1975, and a complaint was never filed. As she was a first year student at Georgetown Law in 1975, I'm not sure Hirono would have had much to say. If DaNang Dick says it, it must be true. Did he draft the Complaint while ducking enemy fire? I'm getting lost in this thread. Is there something about Georgetown Law students that is at issue here?
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,686
|
Post by Elvado on Nov 19, 2018 19:54:15 GMT -5
Maxie Hirono is well-documented hypocrite who had nothing to say while Dan Inouye and Bill Clinton harassed (or worse) women. Johnny One-Note sings again. It is just so puzzling from one who tells men to just shut up because women must be believed (unless of course the accused is a powerful Democrat horndog).
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,686
|
Post by Elvado on Nov 19, 2018 19:56:47 GMT -5
Maxie Hirono is well-documented hypocrite who had nothing to say while Dan Inouye and Bill Clinton harassed (or worse) women. The claim about Sen. Inouye was in 1975, and a complaint was never filed. As she was a first year student at Georgetown Law in 1975, I'm not sure Hirono would have had much to say. If DaNang Dick says it, it must be true. Did he draft the Complaint while ducking enemy fire? I'm getting lost in this thread. Is there something about Georgetown Law students that is at issue here? Megan Bailiff complained about him in 1988 and Mazie was no longer a student but rather a Democrat on the rise indebted to guess whom?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2018 21:52:50 GMT -5
Johnny One-Note sings again. It is just so puzzling from one who tells men to just shut up because women must be believed (unless of course the accused is a powerful Democrat horndog). I was referring to the “Your hypocrisy is worse than mine” bit. It seems to be your only move anymore.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2018 22:30:43 GMT -5
The claim about Sen. Inouye was in 1975, and a complaint was never filed. As she was a first year student at Georgetown Law in 1975, I'm not sure Hirono would have had much to say. I'm getting lost in this thread. Is there something about Georgetown Law students that is at issue here? Megan Bailiff complained about him in 1988 and Mazie was no longer a student but rather a Democrat on the rise indebted to guess whom? My apologies for the previous post. You do have at least one other move: when you can’t find anything to criticize about a Democrat today, go back a few decades.
|
|