DFW HOYA
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 5,861
|
Post by DFW HOYA on Nov 15, 2012 23:39:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by LizziebethHoya on Nov 15, 2012 23:43:30 GMT -5
Good to see some press for the program. Although, I didn't know this fact... "Georgetown plays its home games at a site known simply as Multi-Sport Field, carved out of the rolling slope on the south side of campus. It is also home to the men’s and women’s lacrosse teams and is a stadium on extended delay, its funding having stalled in the middle of the last decade. It has seating, largely temporary, for just 2,500, the smallest capacity of any team’s field in either the Football Bowl or Championship Subdivisions"
|
|
CAHoya07
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 3,598
|
Post by CAHoya07 on Nov 16, 2012 12:54:36 GMT -5
Good article, but I think it's a bit sad that I feel that have been much more substantive articles about Georgetown football in the New York Times the past few years, rather than our local Washington Post.
|
|
|
Post by Problem of Dog on Nov 16, 2012 13:48:58 GMT -5
Nothing really new in that article. Pretty lazy effort by the NYT.
|
|
rosslynhoya
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 2,595
|
Post by rosslynhoya on Nov 16, 2012 15:36:14 GMT -5
Good to see some press for the program. Although, I didn't know this fact... "Georgetown plays its home games at a site known simply as Multi-Sport Field, carved out of the rolling slope on the south side of campus. It is also home to the men’s and women’s lacrosse teams and is a stadium on extended delay, its funding having stalled in the middle of the last decade. It has seating, largely temporary, for just 2,500, the smallest capacity of any team’s field in either the Football Bowl or Championship Subdivisions" It's the smallest listed on Wikipedia, which may or may not be comprehensive. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FCS_football_stadiumsFootnote 3 is your depressant for the day.
|
|
CAHoya07
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 3,598
|
Post by CAHoya07 on Nov 16, 2012 22:31:05 GMT -5
Nothing really new in that article. Pretty lazy effort by the NYT. Nothing new to us, but I imagine a few readers of the New York Times may not be as familiar with Georgetown football...
|
|
|
Post by Problem of Dog on Nov 17, 2012 14:21:23 GMT -5
Nothing really new in that article. Pretty lazy effort by the NYT. Nothing new to us, but I imagine a few readers of the New York Times may not be as familiar with Georgetown football... But still almost nothing new from their last Georgetown football articles.
|
|
CAHoya07
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 3,598
|
Post by CAHoya07 on Nov 17, 2012 14:40:15 GMT -5
Nothing new to us, but I imagine a few readers of the New York Times may not be as familiar with Georgetown football... But still almost nothing new from their last Georgetown football articles. How much has really changed? I guess you could say the one glaring omission in the article is the failure to mention the changing scholarship situation in the Patriot League, and how that will affect Georgetown.
|
|