Post by FLHoya on Jan 31, 2010 23:25:20 GMT -5
HOYAS-DUKE RECAP (1/30/10, 89-77 W)
Still Delusional.
In a reality check to those out there who doubted whether Georgetown remained a nationally relevant program after last year’s disappointing NIT finish…or last Monday’s limp effort in the Carrier Dome…the Hoyas responded with a dominating 89-77 victory over the Duke Blue Devils in front of a spirited crowd of 20,039 at the Verizon Center, including (not insignificantly) the President and Vice President of the United States, distinguished Georgetown alumni, and even the wallet of Ted Leonsis.
Something was clearly broken in the Hoyas 73-56 loss against Syracuse, when Georgetown struggled against a physical front line, failed to penetrate a trapping 2-3 zone defense, and couldn’t blunt any of the Orange’s lengthy scoring runs. It was up in the air who wanted to “fix it”—the task JTIII once famously left in the hands of point guard Jonathan Wallace.
On a given afternoon, that task could fall to any of Georgetown’s “Big Three”—Monroe, Freeman, and Wright. Indeed, this writer has noticed certain trends in how the Hoyas play depending upon which of the three takes primacy.
Saturday we were treated to something different: for the first time this season, all three Hoyas were hitting on all cylinders, combining for 62 points on 23-31 shooting and an irresistible inside-outside combination that befuddled Duke’s lineup of highly-recruited sharpshooters and hustle players, many of whom will undoubtedly head for moderately successful professional careers in short order.
The balanced scoring was for the stat sheet what the brilliant offensive display was to the eye. Mismatches abounded on the court at any given time, and it was the highest achievement of the afternoon that the Hoyas always knew where to find them, from Chris Wright’s energetic slashing and shooting display in the first half to Greg Monroe’s all-purpose dominance of the inside and outside in the second half.
Duke led for 13 seconds midway through the second half, but soon succumbed to a 18-3 scoring surge from the men in gray, who never looked back and never let the Blue Devils within 7 points for the remainder of the game.
My favorite way to describe the extent of the Hoyas’ offensive mastery against the Blue Devils is through the words of Verne Lundquist, who gave the CBS audience these folksy gems after Georgetown baskets during the final ten minutes of game action:
“What a BEAUTIFUL pass from Freeman!”
“OH YEAH!...OH MY GOODNESS!”
“Okay…go ahead and stand up!”
“In the meantime…this has become a blowout.”
Indeed.
Frankly, it may all sound foolish, but this Gray Out was a celebration of what is currently great about Georgetown basketball when played at a high level. For most of the 20,039 in attendance it was a great opportunity to re-connect with Georgetown basketball. For the gifted but unhappy Duke fan population, a head scratcher: pundits in recent years (and Stewart Mandel today) are wondering about Duke’s continued relevance on the Final Four landscape and its downfall from the heights of the early 1990s.
That’s all premature talk of course—if we’ve learned nothing in the past week, it’s that overreacting to losses in the heat of the moment accomplishes little. Duke will be just fine soon enough.
The real question is: what does this result say about Georgetown’s future?
There are three readily available points of reference from which one could choose to glean wisdom from this result, and each holds merit in my view. They are:
Last Monday’s loss to Syracuse
Just five days earlier, the Hoyas faced another top ten-ranked opponent, and the result was much different. Despite racing out to a 14-0 lead before the first media timeout on the back of hot shooting, the Hoyas were ill prepared for the Orange’s intensity or their 2-3 zone defense over the course of a forty minute game. For much of the second half, the Hoyas looked listless and lost against Syracuse, a loss low-lighted by Greg Monroe’s disqualification for foul accumulation.
There was a fair amount of soul-searching and sniping on The Internets about every issue from whether our lack of a deep bench finally caught up, whether Coach Thompson messed up Georgetown’s offensive strategy (a view echoed by assorted television and print pundits), whether the team was heading into a tailspin, and strangely, whether Frank McCourt was still an active member of the GU alumni community.
A week later, it’s now Duke Blue Devil fans bemoaning depth, fatigue, time off, and coaching strategy.
As the incessant 2006 World Cup promotions on ESPN told me, one game changes everything.
To be fair, every game is a unique challenge and the Hoyas were playing with a few built in advantages they hadn’t enjoyed on Monday: a raucous home crowd, an opposing coach that stubbornly refuses to stick with the very defense that Jim Boeheim used to shut down the Hoya offense, and an opponent with depth but not overwhelming quality on the bench.
That being said, reading back over various posts and articles and comments concerning the Georgetown team in the interval between Monday night and Saturday afternoon, everything pointed to a squad determined to put the loss behind them and get better in time for an important game on the weekend. For whatever reason, when Coach Thompson says the Hoyas will fix things and get better, you believe it this season where you did not in 2009.
Well actually there is a reason: they DO get better after a loss, to the tune of 4-0 on the season with impressive wins over Harvard, at Pittsburgh, and now Duke to go along with the comeback victory over Connecticut.
There’s no better cure for the offensive blues than a 71 percent shooting performance.
Last year’s loss to Duke at Cameron Indoor Stadium
I myself was even blindsided by how much Greg Monroe’s mystery technical figured into the pre-game coverage of yesterday’s game. The most interesting aspect for me is the technical foul takes precedence in the media narrative over the rumored locker room scuffle or anything Gerald Henderson did as a cause of the Hoyas’ loss that afternoon.
Of course, this all leads to the one part of the story that DOES appear in every media account—that the Duke game sent the Hoyas on a multi-game tailspin including all the nasty bits we’ll leave to the Hoyatalk archives, not the least of which was a NIT first round loss.
Here’s the thing I don’t like about this: by reducing the Duke game in 2009 to a phantom technical foul, too many of the media accounts allow the Hoyas’ 2009 decline to originate from something unforeseen and completely random. And if randomness can trigger a season-ending tailspin once—one highlighted by “chemistry” issues on the team, another amorphous hard to understand concept for outsiders—couldn’t it happen again? Thus, EVERY loss, every puzzling decision, every change in a player’s mood, could be the start of another Hoyas tailspin if we believe some folks.
It seems fitting then that the game which last season prompted stories of a fight between the members of Georgetown’s backcourt ended this season with Chris Wright and Jason Clark embracing at center court and offering encouraging words to each other.
The January 2006 victory over Duke at MCI Center
I won’t improve on the succinctness and, frankly, accuracy of the posts in the thread linked here on the subject of 2006 vs. 2010: hoyatalk2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=21272 so I won’t try.
I will note, however, an interesting phenomenon that I observed and overheard during the four hours I spent in the Verizon Center.
It started with pre-game discussions, which noted Duke’s potential for great shooting but looked upon their weak road record with much skepticism. It continued at halftime when multiple fans discussed a key advantage the Hoyas would have in holding their halftime lead in this iteration against Duke was the Blue Devils’ lack of a J.J. Redick-like scorer. It became painfully obvious when in the second half JimmyHoya turned to me and stated that on the previous GU possession, all five Hoyas had touched the basketball, and he’d take any of the five one-on-one matchups we saw.
The obvious difference between 2006 and 2010 is that Georgetown is no longer the upstart program trying to rebuild a past legacy of greatness, searching for its first program-defining victory in a new coaching era. We’ve been there and done that since 2006 to the tune of two Big East regular season titles, a Big East Tournament championship, and three NCAA appearances to include a 2007 Final Four appearance.
But it’s not merely the trophy case…it’s the attitude. Verne and Clark spoke at length about the full length mural in McDonough Gym depicting the post-game celebration in January 2006 after Georgetown beat Duke. There won’t be any murals this time—nobody stormed the court. Most students I reckon will just ditch the newspaper inserts reading BEAT DUKE—and certainly nobody decorated the John Carroll statue. And the mood on campus after the game was…well, like after most good Big East games.
Not that there is no joy on F Street, or that the 20,039 fans in the Verizon Center didn’t make Saturday a day to remember.
It’s just…well, my fellow fans couldn’t have stated it any clearer when I asked them how they felt after the game:
This was a team that we should beat in January 2010.
And we should beat more teams like Duke on the way to better things this season. Are we Final Four bound? That isn’t something one can answer in January—even the second weekend of March when brackets are announced only offers a clue in the form of potential matchups. But the spirit is high among Hoya fans on the last day of January 2010—something we could not say in 2009—and I guess what I’m saying right now is: we shouldn’t give up the dream.
How delusional of us.
Still Delusional.
In a reality check to those out there who doubted whether Georgetown remained a nationally relevant program after last year’s disappointing NIT finish…or last Monday’s limp effort in the Carrier Dome…the Hoyas responded with a dominating 89-77 victory over the Duke Blue Devils in front of a spirited crowd of 20,039 at the Verizon Center, including (not insignificantly) the President and Vice President of the United States, distinguished Georgetown alumni, and even the wallet of Ted Leonsis.
Something was clearly broken in the Hoyas 73-56 loss against Syracuse, when Georgetown struggled against a physical front line, failed to penetrate a trapping 2-3 zone defense, and couldn’t blunt any of the Orange’s lengthy scoring runs. It was up in the air who wanted to “fix it”—the task JTIII once famously left in the hands of point guard Jonathan Wallace.
On a given afternoon, that task could fall to any of Georgetown’s “Big Three”—Monroe, Freeman, and Wright. Indeed, this writer has noticed certain trends in how the Hoyas play depending upon which of the three takes primacy.
Saturday we were treated to something different: for the first time this season, all three Hoyas were hitting on all cylinders, combining for 62 points on 23-31 shooting and an irresistible inside-outside combination that befuddled Duke’s lineup of highly-recruited sharpshooters and hustle players, many of whom will undoubtedly head for moderately successful professional careers in short order.
The balanced scoring was for the stat sheet what the brilliant offensive display was to the eye. Mismatches abounded on the court at any given time, and it was the highest achievement of the afternoon that the Hoyas always knew where to find them, from Chris Wright’s energetic slashing and shooting display in the first half to Greg Monroe’s all-purpose dominance of the inside and outside in the second half.
Duke led for 13 seconds midway through the second half, but soon succumbed to a 18-3 scoring surge from the men in gray, who never looked back and never let the Blue Devils within 7 points for the remainder of the game.
My favorite way to describe the extent of the Hoyas’ offensive mastery against the Blue Devils is through the words of Verne Lundquist, who gave the CBS audience these folksy gems after Georgetown baskets during the final ten minutes of game action:
“What a BEAUTIFUL pass from Freeman!”
“OH YEAH!...OH MY GOODNESS!”
“Okay…go ahead and stand up!”
“In the meantime…this has become a blowout.”
Indeed.
Frankly, it may all sound foolish, but this Gray Out was a celebration of what is currently great about Georgetown basketball when played at a high level. For most of the 20,039 in attendance it was a great opportunity to re-connect with Georgetown basketball. For the gifted but unhappy Duke fan population, a head scratcher: pundits in recent years (and Stewart Mandel today) are wondering about Duke’s continued relevance on the Final Four landscape and its downfall from the heights of the early 1990s.
That’s all premature talk of course—if we’ve learned nothing in the past week, it’s that overreacting to losses in the heat of the moment accomplishes little. Duke will be just fine soon enough.
The real question is: what does this result say about Georgetown’s future?
There are three readily available points of reference from which one could choose to glean wisdom from this result, and each holds merit in my view. They are:
Last Monday’s loss to Syracuse
Just five days earlier, the Hoyas faced another top ten-ranked opponent, and the result was much different. Despite racing out to a 14-0 lead before the first media timeout on the back of hot shooting, the Hoyas were ill prepared for the Orange’s intensity or their 2-3 zone defense over the course of a forty minute game. For much of the second half, the Hoyas looked listless and lost against Syracuse, a loss low-lighted by Greg Monroe’s disqualification for foul accumulation.
There was a fair amount of soul-searching and sniping on The Internets about every issue from whether our lack of a deep bench finally caught up, whether Coach Thompson messed up Georgetown’s offensive strategy (a view echoed by assorted television and print pundits), whether the team was heading into a tailspin, and strangely, whether Frank McCourt was still an active member of the GU alumni community.
A week later, it’s now Duke Blue Devil fans bemoaning depth, fatigue, time off, and coaching strategy.
As the incessant 2006 World Cup promotions on ESPN told me, one game changes everything.
To be fair, every game is a unique challenge and the Hoyas were playing with a few built in advantages they hadn’t enjoyed on Monday: a raucous home crowd, an opposing coach that stubbornly refuses to stick with the very defense that Jim Boeheim used to shut down the Hoya offense, and an opponent with depth but not overwhelming quality on the bench.
That being said, reading back over various posts and articles and comments concerning the Georgetown team in the interval between Monday night and Saturday afternoon, everything pointed to a squad determined to put the loss behind them and get better in time for an important game on the weekend. For whatever reason, when Coach Thompson says the Hoyas will fix things and get better, you believe it this season where you did not in 2009.
Well actually there is a reason: they DO get better after a loss, to the tune of 4-0 on the season with impressive wins over Harvard, at Pittsburgh, and now Duke to go along with the comeback victory over Connecticut.
There’s no better cure for the offensive blues than a 71 percent shooting performance.
Last year’s loss to Duke at Cameron Indoor Stadium
I myself was even blindsided by how much Greg Monroe’s mystery technical figured into the pre-game coverage of yesterday’s game. The most interesting aspect for me is the technical foul takes precedence in the media narrative over the rumored locker room scuffle or anything Gerald Henderson did as a cause of the Hoyas’ loss that afternoon.
Of course, this all leads to the one part of the story that DOES appear in every media account—that the Duke game sent the Hoyas on a multi-game tailspin including all the nasty bits we’ll leave to the Hoyatalk archives, not the least of which was a NIT first round loss.
Here’s the thing I don’t like about this: by reducing the Duke game in 2009 to a phantom technical foul, too many of the media accounts allow the Hoyas’ 2009 decline to originate from something unforeseen and completely random. And if randomness can trigger a season-ending tailspin once—one highlighted by “chemistry” issues on the team, another amorphous hard to understand concept for outsiders—couldn’t it happen again? Thus, EVERY loss, every puzzling decision, every change in a player’s mood, could be the start of another Hoyas tailspin if we believe some folks.
It seems fitting then that the game which last season prompted stories of a fight between the members of Georgetown’s backcourt ended this season with Chris Wright and Jason Clark embracing at center court and offering encouraging words to each other.
The January 2006 victory over Duke at MCI Center
I won’t improve on the succinctness and, frankly, accuracy of the posts in the thread linked here on the subject of 2006 vs. 2010: hoyatalk2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=21272 so I won’t try.
I will note, however, an interesting phenomenon that I observed and overheard during the four hours I spent in the Verizon Center.
It started with pre-game discussions, which noted Duke’s potential for great shooting but looked upon their weak road record with much skepticism. It continued at halftime when multiple fans discussed a key advantage the Hoyas would have in holding their halftime lead in this iteration against Duke was the Blue Devils’ lack of a J.J. Redick-like scorer. It became painfully obvious when in the second half JimmyHoya turned to me and stated that on the previous GU possession, all five Hoyas had touched the basketball, and he’d take any of the five one-on-one matchups we saw.
The obvious difference between 2006 and 2010 is that Georgetown is no longer the upstart program trying to rebuild a past legacy of greatness, searching for its first program-defining victory in a new coaching era. We’ve been there and done that since 2006 to the tune of two Big East regular season titles, a Big East Tournament championship, and three NCAA appearances to include a 2007 Final Four appearance.
But it’s not merely the trophy case…it’s the attitude. Verne and Clark spoke at length about the full length mural in McDonough Gym depicting the post-game celebration in January 2006 after Georgetown beat Duke. There won’t be any murals this time—nobody stormed the court. Most students I reckon will just ditch the newspaper inserts reading BEAT DUKE—and certainly nobody decorated the John Carroll statue. And the mood on campus after the game was…well, like after most good Big East games.
Not that there is no joy on F Street, or that the 20,039 fans in the Verizon Center didn’t make Saturday a day to remember.
It’s just…well, my fellow fans couldn’t have stated it any clearer when I asked them how they felt after the game:
This was a team that we should beat in January 2010.
And we should beat more teams like Duke on the way to better things this season. Are we Final Four bound? That isn’t something one can answer in January—even the second weekend of March when brackets are announced only offers a clue in the form of potential matchups. But the spirit is high among Hoya fans on the last day of January 2010—something we could not say in 2009—and I guess what I’m saying right now is: we shouldn’t give up the dream.
How delusional of us.