Post by CO_Hoya on Nov 23, 2006 13:13:03 GMT -5
'Cause that's when the big kids show up (Oregon, at Duke).
It's early, but looking at Ken Pomeroy's stats through 4 games (the_way and other stats-haters can skip this thread), our offense is running better than expected (adjOEff = 119.4 -> 20th), especially considering the number of minutes by players new to the team. We finished last season at 117.9 (9th), and you'd expect some improvement as the younger players learn the system.
Defense, by contrast, has been a disaster so far (adjDEff = 114.4 -> 309th). Last year's team ended ranked 38th (adjDEff = 92.9), primarily on the strength of not fouling (FTRate = 27.3 -> 23rd) and preventing offensive rebounds (OR% = 28.8 -> 38th). This year, fouls are way up (FTRate = 43.7 -> 249th), although this may be in part driven by all the fouls given at the end of the ODU game (16 FTs in the last 2:00). Surprisingly (to me), raw OR% is better than last year (26.4 -> 53rd).
So where are the deficiencies? According to kenpom.com, both 2-pt% (46.1/48.8 for 2006/2007) and 3-pt% (34.7/35.7) are up a notch. Moreover, 3FGA/FGA is down slightly (35.7/35.2) while A/FGM is way up (55.1/62.5). To me, this implies that the rotations/switches used to cover open shooters is allowing opponents to make an extra pass for a closer-in shot (e.g. layup or dunk). Defensive block % has gone up (11.3/16.8), with Roy getting 3.8/game(!), more than double what he got last year, but apparently at the detriment of more FT attempts allowed. Roy's numbers may be inflated by the level of competition so far.
In a nutshell, the team appears to be too aggressive on defense, as embodied by PEJr (1 foul every 4.5 minutes), without gaining steals (steal % is down this year [10.2/7.5]), rather than not aggressive enough, which is what I expected before looking at the stats. This may be a sign of a lack of quickness at certain positions, or could just be a result of over-enthusiastic new players biting on fakes too often.
Anyway, having only watched the Fairfield game, would be curious if those who've seen most/all of the games this year think this analysis makes sense, or have another opinion. Further, is this something that can be fixed in a week?
Happy Thanksgiving!
Some stats defined
adjOEff / adjDEff = points per 100 possessions, adjusted for opponent
FTRate = FTA / FGA
OR% = ORopp / (ORopp + DR)
Block % = Blocks/(Opponents’ 2-pt attempts)
Steal % = Steals/(Opponents possessions)
It's early, but looking at Ken Pomeroy's stats through 4 games (the_way and other stats-haters can skip this thread), our offense is running better than expected (adjOEff = 119.4 -> 20th), especially considering the number of minutes by players new to the team. We finished last season at 117.9 (9th), and you'd expect some improvement as the younger players learn the system.
Defense, by contrast, has been a disaster so far (adjDEff = 114.4 -> 309th). Last year's team ended ranked 38th (adjDEff = 92.9), primarily on the strength of not fouling (FTRate = 27.3 -> 23rd) and preventing offensive rebounds (OR% = 28.8 -> 38th). This year, fouls are way up (FTRate = 43.7 -> 249th), although this may be in part driven by all the fouls given at the end of the ODU game (16 FTs in the last 2:00). Surprisingly (to me), raw OR% is better than last year (26.4 -> 53rd).
So where are the deficiencies? According to kenpom.com, both 2-pt% (46.1/48.8 for 2006/2007) and 3-pt% (34.7/35.7) are up a notch. Moreover, 3FGA/FGA is down slightly (35.7/35.2) while A/FGM is way up (55.1/62.5). To me, this implies that the rotations/switches used to cover open shooters is allowing opponents to make an extra pass for a closer-in shot (e.g. layup or dunk). Defensive block % has gone up (11.3/16.8), with Roy getting 3.8/game(!), more than double what he got last year, but apparently at the detriment of more FT attempts allowed. Roy's numbers may be inflated by the level of competition so far.
In a nutshell, the team appears to be too aggressive on defense, as embodied by PEJr (1 foul every 4.5 minutes), without gaining steals (steal % is down this year [10.2/7.5]), rather than not aggressive enough, which is what I expected before looking at the stats. This may be a sign of a lack of quickness at certain positions, or could just be a result of over-enthusiastic new players biting on fakes too often.
Anyway, having only watched the Fairfield game, would be curious if those who've seen most/all of the games this year think this analysis makes sense, or have another opinion. Further, is this something that can be fixed in a week?
Happy Thanksgiving!
Some stats defined
adjOEff / adjDEff = points per 100 possessions, adjusted for opponent
FTRate = FTA / FGA
OR% = ORopp / (ORopp + DR)
Block % = Blocks/(Opponents’ 2-pt attempts)
Steal % = Steals/(Opponents possessions)