rkerby15
Bulldog (over 250 posts)
Posts: 301
|
Post by rkerby15 on Jun 22, 2022 8:27:07 GMT -5
|
|
hoya73
Golden Hoya (over 1000 posts)
Posts: 1,222
|
Post by hoya73 on Jun 24, 2022 9:29:09 GMT -5
I appreciate the work rkerby puts in on following recruiting.
And, I am definitely NOT qualified to be the board police. Just asking for a concensus of opinion as to what criteria, if any, should distinguish between
a potential recruit having his own thread, as opposed to being subsumed under the thread for his recruiting year class.
Apologies in advance if I am out of line in raising this question.
|
|
617hoya
Bulldog (over 250 posts)
Posts: 254 
|
Post by 617hoya on Jun 24, 2022 15:28:20 GMT -5
I totally agree with the above ^ The lone threads for any random prospect with minimum involvement from Georgetown is unnecessary, IMO. Let’s keep the threads to players who are clearly being prioritized by the team.
|
|
hoyarooter
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,199
|
Post by hoyarooter on Jun 24, 2022 18:03:56 GMT -5
I totally agree with the above ^ The lone threads for any random prospect with minimum involvement from Georgetown is unnecessary, IMO. Let’s keep the threads to players who are clearly being prioritized by the team. Yep, me too. A player who hasn't even received an offer should be lumped in with the others under the general thread for players from that class. I'm not the arbiter here, but to me it would make sense to open a separate thread for a player only if that player has expressed clear interest in us. |
|
