|
Post by hoyalove4ever on Jun 23, 2014 11:40:52 GMT -5
I love the comments regarding his defense and handle. He sounds like a real player.
|
|
|
Post by triplehoya09 on Jun 23, 2014 20:51:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by BubbleVisionBiff on Jun 24, 2014 5:55:35 GMT -5
They do good stuff, but didn't 24/7 have Trier as like a 75% chance of being a Hoya?
|
|
prhoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 23,271
|
Post by prhoya on Jun 24, 2014 7:10:22 GMT -5
246's percentages change with the latest information. That 75% was good only if Trier was going to commit at that time.
|
|
|
Post by BubbleVisionBiff on Jun 24, 2014 7:23:19 GMT -5
My point exactly.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2014 11:59:56 GMT -5
NBPA Top 100 Camp Top Shooting Guards & Recruiting Info By Jamie Shaw 1 Dwayne Bacon 6’6 2015 Oak Hill Academy/Showtime Ballerz Bacon was fantastic throughout the weekend. He played with efficiency showing the ability to get out and run in the open court and handle to attack at all three levels in the half court. Showing up this AAU season with a much more toned body, Bacon had a logical approach and executed. After a year playing at Oak Hill his game will only tighten. Stats for the Week: 14.8 Points, 53% FG, 44% 3FG, 2.5 boards, 1.3 assists, 1.5 steals Is in the process of scheduling official visits to Southern Cal and Georgetown after July. Bacon speaks very highly of Louisville as well, and while they have yet to offer, would have to figure into the mix if they were to. Not sure how that looks with a 3 wing and a 2/1 combo guard looking very good for them. UCLA and Tennessee seem to have some consistent buzz with him as well. phenomhoopreport.com/nbpa-top-100-camp-top-shooting-guards-recruiting-info/
|
|
|
Post by BubbleVisionBiff on Jun 27, 2014 12:38:40 GMT -5
|
|
blueandgray
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 6,749
|
Post by blueandgray on Jun 27, 2014 20:08:05 GMT -5
Up to #22 in rivals latest rankings. He's a good one.
|
|
sleepy
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 6,079
|
Post by sleepy on Jun 30, 2014 12:37:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by BubbleVisionBiff on Jun 30, 2014 12:47:21 GMT -5
Dumb@$$. How about do your research and see what Porter did and also discover the fact that Bacon's GF is a Hoya.
And the fact that we've had a lead guard who gets most of the scoring last year and this coming year is an argument FOR Bacon to come here.
|
|
|
Post by dungeon ball on Jun 30, 2014 12:53:24 GMT -5
Typical off season click bait, like the coaches countdown on ESPN. Honestly, whenever I see writers still talk about the "Princeton Offense," they immediately come off as lazy
|
|
|
Post by hoyasaxa2003 on Jun 30, 2014 12:54:46 GMT -5
Obviously, I think that blurb is dumb, but if Bacon's primary goal is to take every shot and score as many times as possible through volume, then Georgetown probably isn't the best fit for him. The article dismisses DSR, but I think that's actually one of the best arguments you have for the fact that Bacon would have similar opportunities at Georgetown. EDIT: Dungeon, I agree. If anybody thinks we played the Princeton Offense last year, they did not watch our games.
|
|
|
Post by HoyaSinceBirth on Jun 30, 2014 13:59:05 GMT -5
1) It's bleacher report which is terrible.
2) He's a kentucky fan.
|
|
|
Post by michaelgrahmstylie on Jun 30, 2014 14:25:29 GMT -5
I don't even know what to call that piddly contribution; just unnecessary and lazy stereotyping.
|
|
hoyainspirit
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
When life puts that voodoo on me, music is my gris-gris.
Posts: 8,392
|
Post by hoyainspirit on Jun 30, 2014 15:14:09 GMT -5
Bleacher Report. Yawn.
|
|
prhoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 23,271
|
Post by prhoya on Jun 30, 2014 15:39:42 GMT -5
Obviously, I think that blurb is dumb, but if Bacon's primary goal is to take every shot and score as many times as possible through volume, then Georgetown probably isn't the best fit for him. The article dismisses DSR, but I think that's actually one of the best arguments you have for the fact that Bacon would have similar opportunities at Georgetown. Nor will he be able to play with four other five-star kids looking to do precisely that... EDIT: Dungeon, I agree. If anybody thinks we played the Princeton Offense last year, they did not watch our games. Agree.
|
|
MCIGuy
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Anyone here? What am I supposed to update?
Posts: 9,423
|
Post by MCIGuy on Jun 30, 2014 16:37:54 GMT -5
While I agree that the implication is bogus I think we should be fair nonetheless. Often when people on HT read about a player (particularly a big) who has an advanced halfcourt game and knows how to pass the ball, they immediately shout to the rooftops that such player would be perfect for III's offense (otherwise known to many as the Princeton offense). Based upon the recruit in question we seem to switch back and forth in regards to how we view the scheme of the offense itself.
|
|
|
Post by michaelgrahmstylie on Jun 30, 2014 17:35:27 GMT -5
While I agree that the implication is bogus I think we should be fair nonetheless. Often when people on HT read about a player (particularly a big) who has an advanced halfcourt game and knows how to pass the ball, they immediately shout to the rooftops that such player would be perfect for III's offense (otherwise known to many as the Princeton offense). Based upon the recruit in question we seem to switch back and forth in regards to how we view the scheme of the offense itself. I think you are stretching, now. Saying that a player would be good for a particular system is one thing. It is quite another to label it this or that. Anyone who has seen the evolution of the Princeton Offense under JT-3 would not call the current system the "Princeton Offense". Several NBA teams incorporate a little bit of the so called Princeton Offense. The Spurs are a prime example. You don't hear anyone saying, "Well, they run this 'Princeton Offense'."
|
|
MCIGuy
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Anyone here? What am I supposed to update?
Posts: 9,423
|
Post by MCIGuy on Jun 30, 2014 17:52:30 GMT -5
How am I stretching when we go from saying such-and-such recruit should choose GU because of the system we have been playing for years (implying Princeton, halfcourt ball) and then in the next minute we say a guy who may be better suited for a fastbreak fullcourt style should pay no heed to the "naysayers" regarding GU's rep for using a more slow tempo, deliberate system? We're claiming the style as a badge of honor for one recruit and then distancing ourselves from it when a different type of recruit comes along.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2014 16:56:27 GMT -5
|
|