Post by bmartin on Mar 28, 2012 10:32:19 GMT -5
Offensive and Defensive comparison of the past five seasons:
(Raw, not adjusted)
Offensive Efficiency, All games & Big East only
2008 111.5 All; 105.1 BE
2009 106.4 All; 101.4 BE
2010 110.4 All; 109.2 BE (Great BE O)
2011 107.4 All; 102.6 BE
2012 106.3 All; 102.1 BE
Defensive Efficiency, All & Big East
2008 92.7 All; 93.4 BE (2nd in BE)
2009 97.3 All; 102.9 BE
2010 98.5 All; 103.8 BE
2011 101.7 All; 103.7 BE
2012 92.1 All; 94.3 BE (2nd in BE)
(Great D in 2008 & 2012; Bad D in between)
Raw Tempo
2008 62.1 All; 62.5 BE
2009 64.2 All; 63.6 BE
2010 66.8 All; 66.4 BE
2011 65.0 All; 63.0 BE
2012 63.5 All; 62.9 BE
(D correlated to pace more than O?)
Offensive Effective FG%; 3P%; 2P% (All Games)
2008 56.8; 38.4; 56.3 (4th in nation EFG%; 2nd in 2P%)
2009 53.0; 33.2; 54.8 (7th in 2P%)
2010 55.7; 38.7; 54.7 (5th in EFG% & 2P%)
2011 54.1; 35.4; 54.6 (5th in 2P%)
2012 51.4; 34.4; 51.3 (Nothing special)
Defensive EFG%; 3P%; 2P% (All games)
2008 42.0; 29.9; 40.5 (1st; 4th; 3rd in nation)
2009 45.9; 32.1; 44.7
2010 47.4; 33.5; 46.0
2011 46.8; 33.7; 45.3
2012 43.1; 27.7; 43.9 (4th in EFG%; 1st in 3P%)
Offensive Rebounding %, All Games & Big East only
2008 33.8 All; 32.3 BE
2009 33.5 All; 34.0 BE
2010 32.6 All; 30.3 BE (Very Bad)
2011 33.4 All; 32.5 BE
2012 35.1 All; 36.0 BE (Good)
Opponents OR%, All & Big East
2008 32.8 All; 33.7 BE
2009 36.2 All; 36.7 BE (Very Bad)
2010 32.1 All; 33.2 BE
2011 32.3 All; 34.9 BE
2012 30.3 All; 30.7 BE (1st in BE)
What these number show more than anything is that the 2012 team was the opposite of the 2010 team. 2010 had great offense, but poor defense and rebounding; 2012 had great defense and rebounding, but very average offense.
(Raw, not adjusted)
Offensive Efficiency, All games & Big East only
2008 111.5 All; 105.1 BE
2009 106.4 All; 101.4 BE
2010 110.4 All; 109.2 BE (Great BE O)
2011 107.4 All; 102.6 BE
2012 106.3 All; 102.1 BE
Defensive Efficiency, All & Big East
2008 92.7 All; 93.4 BE (2nd in BE)
2009 97.3 All; 102.9 BE
2010 98.5 All; 103.8 BE
2011 101.7 All; 103.7 BE
2012 92.1 All; 94.3 BE (2nd in BE)
(Great D in 2008 & 2012; Bad D in between)
Raw Tempo
2008 62.1 All; 62.5 BE
2009 64.2 All; 63.6 BE
2010 66.8 All; 66.4 BE
2011 65.0 All; 63.0 BE
2012 63.5 All; 62.9 BE
(D correlated to pace more than O?)
Offensive Effective FG%; 3P%; 2P% (All Games)
2008 56.8; 38.4; 56.3 (4th in nation EFG%; 2nd in 2P%)
2009 53.0; 33.2; 54.8 (7th in 2P%)
2010 55.7; 38.7; 54.7 (5th in EFG% & 2P%)
2011 54.1; 35.4; 54.6 (5th in 2P%)
2012 51.4; 34.4; 51.3 (Nothing special)
Defensive EFG%; 3P%; 2P% (All games)
2008 42.0; 29.9; 40.5 (1st; 4th; 3rd in nation)
2009 45.9; 32.1; 44.7
2010 47.4; 33.5; 46.0
2011 46.8; 33.7; 45.3
2012 43.1; 27.7; 43.9 (4th in EFG%; 1st in 3P%)
Offensive Rebounding %, All Games & Big East only
2008 33.8 All; 32.3 BE
2009 33.5 All; 34.0 BE
2010 32.6 All; 30.3 BE (Very Bad)
2011 33.4 All; 32.5 BE
2012 35.1 All; 36.0 BE (Good)
Opponents OR%, All & Big East
2008 32.8 All; 33.7 BE
2009 36.2 All; 36.7 BE (Very Bad)
2010 32.1 All; 33.2 BE
2011 32.3 All; 34.9 BE
2012 30.3 All; 30.7 BE (1st in BE)
What these number show more than anything is that the 2012 team was the opposite of the 2010 team. 2010 had great offense, but poor defense and rebounding; 2012 had great defense and rebounding, but very average offense.