Cambridge
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Canes Pugnaces
Posts: 5,304
|
Post by Cambridge on Mar 10, 2005 11:35:58 GMT -5
kenpom.typepad.com/According to Pomeroy, everyone has been calculating the RPI incorrectly this year. The new home-away weighting DOES NOT apply to the SOS portion of the equation as was thought by himself, ESPN and others. Rather, as Andy Katz discovered after conversations with members of the committee, it only applies to the teams own wins and losses... Hence our new RPI of...wait for it: 68 I'm not sh*ing you. Check this link: kenpom.com/rpi.php
|
|
the_way
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
The Illest
Posts: 5,422
|
Post by the_way on Mar 10, 2005 11:37:32 GMT -5
I can't believe this. What a huge mistake and costly mistake. I knew their was something wrong about our RPI calculations this year.
|
|
Cambridge
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Canes Pugnaces
Posts: 5,304
|
Post by Cambridge on Mar 10, 2005 11:38:06 GMT -5
Just for the record, our "old" RPI (the one used last year) would be 57...
|
|
|
Post by HoyaAlbany on Mar 10, 2005 11:47:04 GMT -5
There are 8 teams below us already in; barring othe upsets, that means 23 teams above us would get the autpmatic bids. Add 34 at large teams, that brings us to 57 as the "magic " spot. I know that is just theoretical, but a win tonight against UConn would push us up close to where we would need to be.
|
|
Grandpa
Silver Hoya (over 500 posts)
Posts: 732
|
Post by Grandpa on Mar 10, 2005 11:48:04 GMT -5
kenpom.typepad.com/According to Pomeroy, everyone has been calculating the RPI incorrectly this year. The new home-away weighting DOES NOT apply to the SOS portion of the equation as was thought by himself, ESPN and others. Rather, as Andy Katz discovered after conversations with members of the committee, it only applies to the teams own wins and losses... Hence our new RPI of...wait for it: 68 I'm not sh*ing you. Check this link: kenpom.com/rpi.php Can one of our resident "math whiz"s (Cambridge / SF / anyone else) run the math of what we would be at if we were to somehow beat UConn tonight? Thanks in advance.
|
|
SFHoya99
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 17,791
|
Post by SFHoya99 on Mar 10, 2005 12:00:00 GMT -5
kenpom.typepad.com/According to Pomeroy, everyone has been calculating the RPI incorrectly this year. The new home-away weighting DOES NOT apply to the SOS portion of the equation as was thought by himself, ESPN and others. Rather, as Andy Katz discovered after conversations with members of the committee, it only applies to the teams own wins and losses... Hence our new RPI of...wait for it: 68 I'm not sh*ing you. Check this link: kenpom.com/rpi.php That's amazing. That's probably why the weighting is so high. It's logically idiotic -- it values your team based on home and away, but not your opponents. But I think they upped the weighting because of that. Our RPI jumps 30 spaces, Pitt and WVU are, for the moment, Top 50 RPI wins, and Providence and Oral Roberts stop being "bad" losses as they become Top 100 losses.
|
|
Cambridge
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Canes Pugnaces
Posts: 5,304
|
Post by Cambridge on Mar 10, 2005 12:37:08 GMT -5
Currently, there are 8 teams outside of the top 65 RPI teams that have securred autobids....
That means 57 is the magic number. Get as close as possible to that number...Come on Hoyas.
Our current resume:
RPI: 68 (57 old) SOS: 57 OOC SOS: 198 Conference: 9-8 Non-Conference: 8-3 Road & Neutral: 7-6 Last 10: 4-6
Key Wins: 1-50: 3-6 -- @pitt(34), @nova(14) & vsWest Virginia(50) 51-100: 3-3 -- @davidson(76), vsND(66)
Key Losses: 101+: 6-2 -- vsTemple(104) & @st. John's(162)*
*vsProvidence(95) & nOral Roberts(94) are just outside the cutoff...fair or unfair
|
|
Cambridge
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Canes Pugnaces
Posts: 5,304
|
Post by Cambridge on Mar 10, 2005 13:54:35 GMT -5
Resume: Avg RPI Win: 156.9 Avg RPI Loss: 53.8 Win-Loss: 17-11 OCC: 8-3 Last 10 Games: 4-6 Conf RPI: 3 Record by RPI: Overall: Totals | RPI 1-25 | RPI 26-50 | W-L Records | RPI 51-100 | RPI 101-150 | RPI 150+ | 17-11 | 1-6 | 2-0 | Overall | 3-2 | 3-1 | 7-1 | 9-5 | 0-3 | 1-0 | Home | 1-0 | 2-1 | 6-1 | 4-5 | 1-3 | 1-0 | Away | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | Neutral | 1-1 | 1-0 | 1-0 |
Out of Conference: Totals | RPI 1-25 | RPI 26-50 | OOC | RPI 51-100 | RPI 101-150 | RPI 150+ | 8-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | Overall | 2-1 | 0-1 | 6-0 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | Home | 0-0 | 0-1 | 5-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | Away | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | Neutral | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-0 |
Conference: Totals | RPI 1-25 | RPI 26-50 | BE Play | RPI 51-100 | RPI 101-150 | RPI 150+ | 9-8 | 1-5 | 2-0 | Overall | 1-2 | 4-0 | 1-1 | 5-3 | 0-2 | 1-0 | Home | 1-1 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 1-0 | Away | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | Neutral | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 |
Results by RPI: RPI | Opponents | Score | RPI | Opponents | Score | RPI | Opponents | Score | RPI | Opponents | Score | 4 | Illinois | 59-74 | 34 | @ Pitt | 67-64 | 66 | @ ND | 64-70 | 104 | Temple | 57-75 | 8 | @ BC | 49-64 | 50 | WVU | 67-60 | 66 | ND | 55-54 | 128 | N Seton Hall | 56-51 | 12 | @ UConn | 64-83 | | | | 76 | @ Davidson | 76-51 | 128 | Seton Hall | 61-51 | 12 | N UConn | ? - ? | | | | 93 | N Clemson | 75-60 | 139 | @ Rutgers | 61-56 | 12 | UConn | 59-66 | | | | 94 | N Oral R. | 63-81 | 139 | Rutgers | 62-55 | 14 | @ Nova | 66-64 | | | | 95 | Provodence | 65-68 | 162 | @ St. John's | 67-76 | 14 | Nova | 56-67 | | | | | | | 162 | St. John's | 66-57 | 21 | @syracuse | 73-78 | | | | | | | 217 | Penn St | 66-53 | | | | | | | | | | 257 | N L.B. St | 57-51 | | | | | | | | | | 269 | Norfolk St | 78-70 | | | | | | | | | | 277 | San Jose St | 58-40 | | | | | | | | | | 296 | Citadel | 69-34 | | | | | | | | | | 322 | Howard | 79-56 |
Last 10 Games: 8 | @ Boston Coll | 49-64 | 128 | Seton Hall | 61-51 | 139 | @ Rutgers | 61-56 | 50 | West Virginia | 67-60 | 66 | @ Notre Dame | 64-70 | 162 | @ St. John's | 67-76 | 14 | Nova | 56-67 | 12 | @ UConn | 64-83 | 95 | Providence | 65-68 | 128 | N Seton Hall | 56-51 | 12 | N UConn | ? - ? |
|
|
|
Post by coachmcguirk on Mar 10, 2005 14:25:28 GMT -5
Could one of you guys do my taxes?
|
|