DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 32,084
|
Post by DanMcQ on Aug 27, 2024 21:54:09 GMT -5
|
|
hoyarooter
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,443
|
Post by hoyarooter on Aug 28, 2024 19:16:57 GMT -5
As we Hebrews like to say, from his mouth to God's ears.
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 32,084
|
Post by DanMcQ on Aug 31, 2024 7:18:32 GMT -5
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 32,084
|
Post by DanMcQ on Sept 1, 2024 2:18:40 GMT -5
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 32,084
|
Post by DanMcQ on Sept 1, 2024 20:18:10 GMT -5
|
|
tashoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 12,572
|
Post by tashoya on Sept 1, 2024 23:04:37 GMT -5
Imagine being so scared of brown people that you'd cast a vote for this transparent idiot. So depressing. Though it is, masochistically, funny that the folks that do tend to vote for him are the supposed, "pull yourself up by your bootstraps," crowd while whining about losing jobs. Did they forget where their bootstraps were? Pull harder, dummies. Remember when we had reverence for veterans and for those that did everything they could to come here to build a better life for their kids and their kids' kids? What's different now that makes those things lesser than they once were and, at worst, target populations? The whitest of the white of us should be embarrassed and horrified. My ancestors are mostly German, Irish and Scandinavian. I'm grateful that my grandparents on one side and great grandparents on the other took a huge chance on a better life during a time when they knew they'd be welcomed. For those that try the same now with no hope that they'll be welcomed, I both wonder what kind of situation they're leaving such that that still seems like a worthwhile opportunity and try to wrap my mind around the thought that anyone that loves this country as a citizen would demonize people just like their own ancestors but in a 10X worse situation.
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 32,084
|
Post by DanMcQ on Sept 2, 2024 10:34:07 GMT -5
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 32,084
|
Post by DanMcQ on Sept 4, 2024 6:33:38 GMT -5
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 19,180
|
Post by SSHoya on Sept 4, 2024 11:22:12 GMT -5
This has less than 1% chance of being successful. If SC Smith has not sought Cannon's removal, the 11th Circuit will not likely give this much consideration, if any. A watchdog group is asking the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to remove Judge Aileen Cannon from overseeing former President Trump’s classified documents case, arguing she has taken “many efforts to undermine and derail the prosecution of this case.” The brief from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) comes as special counsel Jack Smith is appealing a ruling from Cannon that tossed the documents case entirely in determining Smith was unlawfully appointed. thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4861235-crew-requests-removal-cannon/
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 32,084
|
Post by DanMcQ on Sept 5, 2024 17:01:53 GMT -5
|
|
hoyarooter
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,443
|
Post by hoyarooter on Sept 5, 2024 18:40:43 GMT -5
How dare she. Put that Commie Pinko judge in jail this instant.
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 32,084
|
Post by DanMcQ on Sept 5, 2024 19:19:11 GMT -5
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 32,084
|
Post by DanMcQ on Sept 5, 2024 19:31:53 GMT -5
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 19,180
|
Post by SSHoya on Sept 25, 2024 6:59:00 GMT -5
Judge allows lengthy brief in Trump case, rejecting claim of election impact A federal judge on Tuesday granted prosecutors’ request to file an up-to-180-page legal brief this week arguing why Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election should not be immune from criminal prosecution, rejecting the former president’s claims that its timing was unfair or politically motivated with the election fast approaching. U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan agreed with special counsel Jack Smith’s office, which argued that the extra-long briefing was necessary because the Supreme Court’s July ruling on presidential immunity required her as trial judge to decide what allegations and evidence against Trump could be admissible. “The Supreme Court directed this court to conduct a ‘close’ and ‘fact specific’ analysis ‘of the indictment’s extensive and interrelated allegations,’” including Trump’s alleged interactions with state officials and private actors and his communications, Chutkan wrote in a nine-page opinion that quoted from the Supreme Court ruling. “The length and breadth of the Government’s proposed brief reflects the uniquely ‘challenging’ and factbound nature of those determinations. The briefs’ atypical sequence and size thus both serve the efficient resolution of immunity issues in this case ‘at the earliest possible stage.’” www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/09/24/trump-filing-allowed-jan-6-case/
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 32,084
|
Post by DanMcQ on Oct 1, 2024 15:57:04 GMT -5
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 19,180
|
Post by SSHoya on Oct 2, 2024 15:59:09 GMT -5
"So what?" -- Demented Donnie Special counsel Jack Smith laid out new evidence to support his assertion that Donald Trump’s efforts to subvert the results of the 2020 election were taken as a private candidate, rather than his official capacity as the president, in a much-anticipated 165-page filing unsealed Wednesday that detailed Trump’s private interactions with his vice president and others. The filing described what the then-president told key figures in his orbit, including vice president Mike Pence, attorney Rudy Giuliani and senior White House and Republican Party officials, though it shielded some of their names, and how some in his orbit told him his claims of having won the election were false. It also detailed what Trump was doing on Jan. 6, as his supporters stormed the Capitol. www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/10/02/jack-smith-filing-trump-immunity-jan-6/Link to 165-page filing embedded here: A lengthy motion from special counsel Jack Smith was unsealed Wednesday, making public what prosecutors say is new evidence that former President Trump and his allies tried to subvert the 2020 presidential election results. The big picture: U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan unsealed the 165-page redacted motion, despite Trump's opposition. www.axios.com/2024/10/02/read-trump-filing-new-evidence-2020-election-case
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 32,084
|
Post by DanMcQ on Oct 2, 2024 18:55:15 GMT -5
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 32,084
|
Post by DanMcQ on Oct 2, 2024 19:22:52 GMT -5
|
|
hoyarooter
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,443
|
Post by hoyarooter on Oct 2, 2024 19:31:31 GMT -5
I'm hoping this stuff will be our October surprise. It has to persuade some people who are on the fence that they must come out and vote for Harris, doesn't it (and, as an aside, that Trump belongs in prison for the next 1000 years)? Meanwhile, though, I'm guessing this story got zero coverage on the Fake News Network, OAN and Newsmax.
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 32,084
|
Post by DanMcQ on Oct 2, 2024 20:14:14 GMT -5
|
|