DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 30,476
|
Post by DanMcQ on Oct 29, 2020 6:40:49 GMT -5
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 30,476
|
Post by DanMcQ on Oct 31, 2020 6:43:42 GMT -5
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,478
|
Post by Elvado on Oct 31, 2020 7:32:32 GMT -5
Very statesmanlike thing to say. Nancy is a real class act. Should Kagan and Sotomayor recuse as well because they were appointed while Biden was VP? The primary reason Nancy needs to wear mask is so no one can hear her idiocy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2020 13:53:00 GMT -5
Very statesmanlike thing to say. Nancy is a real class act. Should Kagan and Sotomayor recuse as well because they were appointed while Biden was VP? The primary reason Nancy needs to wear mask is so no one can hear her idiocy. Counterpoint:
|
|
hoya9797
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 4,201
|
Post by hoya9797 on Oct 31, 2020 13:55:40 GMT -5
Is Kavanaugh incompetent or unethical? How to explain this one?
|
|
|
Post by badgerhoya on Oct 31, 2020 15:02:15 GMT -5
Is Kavanaugh incompetent or unethical? How to explain this one? I think it’s the beer talking.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2020 15:40:27 GMT -5
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 30,476
|
Post by DanMcQ on Nov 10, 2020 12:37:23 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2020 10:56:38 GMT -5
You would think a Supreme Court justice would know public criticism isn’t censorship, it’s also freedom of speech.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2020 14:55:25 GMT -5
The attacks on Amy Coney Barrett’s Catholicism honor RBG how? Did you ever find any examples of this? happyhoya1979 I had been under the impression that Republicans felt very strongly that it was out of bounds to attack someone for their religious beliefs and doctrines.
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 30,476
|
Post by DanMcQ on Jan 16, 2021 11:32:53 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2021 13:10:50 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2021 13:30:43 GMT -5
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 30,476
|
Post by DanMcQ on Sept 2, 2021 1:55:15 GMT -5
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 30,476
|
Post by DanMcQ on Sept 2, 2021 1:56:24 GMT -5
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 30,476
|
Post by DanMcQ on Sept 2, 2021 1:57:55 GMT -5
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 30,476
|
Post by DanMcQ on Sept 2, 2021 7:04:52 GMT -5
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 30,476
|
Post by DanMcQ on Sept 2, 2021 9:54:34 GMT -5
|
|
HoyaNyr320
Golden Hoya (over 1000 posts)
Posts: 1,233
|
Post by HoyaNyr320 on Sept 2, 2021 10:09:35 GMT -5
I'm wondering whether blue states could use the Court's reasoning here to implement gun control measures. Just allow private citizens to sue anyone at $10,000 a pop for "aiding and abetting" the purchase of a gun with exceptions for law enforcement and hunters. Gun stores would have to stop selling weapons until a test case filters up the court system, or face the prospect of defending a flood of litigation. It is a stupid way to regulate, but why not fight fire with fire and let the Court try to distinguish it from the emergency relief it just denied.
|
|
DanMcQ
Moderator
Posts: 30,476
|
Post by DanMcQ on Sept 2, 2021 10:20:58 GMT -5
|
|