Obviously they're preoccupied covering this wonderful "success story"... SMFH
I’d feel bad for him if he weren’t such a ghoul. It can’t be easy going through life with little to no discernible talent and failing at literally every single thing you’ve ever tried. I mean, except those things that his daddy obviously helped with.
If you’re asking about my sexual assault allegation as disqualification for president remark, that’s kind of what I was getting at. I’d personally be more than happy to disqualify both as long as come January, anybody but Trump is in the White House. Obviously, it doesn’t work that way. As for no one mentioning Tara Reade, it’s for the same reason you do not come on here and mention how completely incompetent Trump is: he’s your guy. For better or worse, Joe Biden is a lot of people’s guy because he is not Trump. I’m not speaking for anybody else on this board, but that’s where I am. Biden is not ideal, but at least he’s not an unrepentant, corrupt, sociopathic POS.
You have explained beautifully why you don’t mention Ms Reade. Where is what purports to be the media In this country? If her allegations are true the presumptive Democrat nominee for President stuck his fingers into a woman’s genital area without permission while she was his employee.
Is there not a question to be asked by someone In the mainstream media?
You have explained beautifully why you don’t mention Ms Reade. Where is what purports to be the media In this country? If her allegations are true the presumptive Democrat nominee for President stuck his fingers into a woman’s genital area without permission while she was his employee.
Is there not a question to be asked by someone In the mainstream media?
The NYT doesn’t count as mainstream media?
I guess the Washington Post or NPR isn't MSM either. Maybe Ruth Marcus is only a "nobody" in the right wing echo chamber.
The NYT wrote a long article about it three weeks ago. The mainstream media was on this before you started complaining.
They did a cursory review; accepted Joe’s words and said there was no pattern of abuse. Then the whole media filed it away as done.
Until the corroborating witnesses came out. Then, while Lady Rodham was endorsing Joe, the media went radio silent as the longtime protector and enabler of a sexual predator endorsed her next sexual predator candidate.
Why are you glad? Stories like this have no beginning and no end, cannot be proven or disproven, and unless you're in a super PAC have no material gain for anyone.
It's pleasing, perhaps, for the Bernie Bros, which I don't think you're among, but the D's will not let the Comrade ascend to the nomination under any circumstance. There are very, very few voters who will choose to vote for Donald Trump because he's a more virtuous man. If he said it didn't happen, will you believe him? So what's the point?
Much like Justice Kavanaugh, no good can come out of it and it's a distraction that does not serve the electoral process very well.
The NYT wrote a long article about it three weeks ago. The mainstream media was on this before you started complaining.
They did a cursory review; accepted Joe’s words and said there was no pattern of abuse. Then the whole media filed it away as done.
Until the corroborating witnesses came out. Then, while Lady Rodham was endorsing Joe, the media went radio silent as the longtime protector and enabler of a sexual predator endorsed her next sexual predator candidate.
“Cursory”
Soon after Ms. Reade made the new allegation, in a podcast interview released on March 25, The Times began reporting on her account and seeking corroboration through interviews, documents and other sources. The Times interviewed Ms. Reade on multiple days over hours, as well as those she told about Mr. Biden’s behavior and other friends. The Times has also interviewed lawyers who spoke to Ms. Reade about her allegation; nearly two dozen people who worked with Mr. Biden during the early 1990s, including many who worked with Ms. Reade; and the other seven women who criticized Mr. Biden last year, to discuss their experiences with him
They did a cursory review; accepted Joe’s words and said there was no pattern of abuse. Then the whole media filed it away as done.
Until the corroborating witnesses came out. Then, while Lady Rodham was endorsing Joe, the media went radio silent as the longtime protector and enabler of a sexual predator endorsed her next sexual predator candidate.
“Cursory”
Soon after Ms. Reade made the new allegation, in a podcast interview released on March 25, The Times began reporting on her account and seeking corroboration through interviews, documents and other sources. The Times interviewed Ms. Reade on multiple days over hours, as well as those she told about Mr. Biden’s behavior and other friends. The Times has also interviewed lawyers who spoke to Ms. Reade about her allegation; nearly two dozen people who worked with Mr. Biden during the early 1990s, including many who worked with Ms. Reade; and the other seven women who criticized Mr. Biden last year, to discuss their experiences with him
Compare to what they did to Kavanaugh and get back to me.
An editor at Fox News killed a report prior to the 2016 presidential election revealing that President Trump engaged in an affair with adult-film actress Stormy Daniels years ago, The New Yorker reported on Monday.
According to the magazine, former FoxNews.com reporter Diana Falzone "had obtained proof" of the affair and confirmed it with several key sources, including Daniels and her ex-husband.
Falzone had also reportedly obtained emails between Daniels’s attorney and Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen that showed that Cohen had proposed to pay cash to Daniels in exchange for a nondisclosure agreement.
But the report was never published, according to The New Yorker, which added that former Fox News executive Ken LaCorte ultimately told Falzone to "let it go."
“Good reporting, kiddo. But Rupert [Murdoch] wants Donald Trump to win. So just let it go," LaCorte reportedly said.
RW media swallowed 25+ women that accused Trump in one gulp. Show me a right wing media outlet that went as far as the NYT or WAPO have gone in their coverage of the allegations against Trump or Kavanaugh. I'll wait...
Last Edit: Apr 29, 2020 21:09:17 GMT -5 by Deleted
Why are you glad? Stories like this have no beginning and no end, cannot be proven or disproven, and unless you're in a super PAC have no material gain for anyone.
It's pleasing, perhaps, for the Bernie Bros, which I don't think you're among, but the D's will not let the Comrade ascend to the nomination under any circumstance. There are very, very few voters who will choose to vote for Donald Trump because he's a more virtuous man. If he said it didn't happen, will you believe him? So what's the point?
Much like Justice Kavanaugh, no good can come out of it and it's a distraction that does not serve the electoral process very well.
Elvado, are you changing your vote because of this?
There’s a saying in the college basketball world that teams play like the coaches that lead them. This will be true of Georgetown under Cooley’s staff as well. “Discipline is a staple. Toughness, energy, connection, and enthusiasm. Those things will also be staples of our organization,” he said.
A Silicon Valley engineer with no medical supply background tweeted at Trump saying he could provide ventilators. Days later, New York state paid him $69.1 million — at the recommendation of the White House task force. But the ventilators never arrived.
Who does this?
Last Edit: Apr 29, 2020 21:37:47 GMT -5 by Deleted