Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2019 18:20:21 GMT -5
Fox News' Chris Wallace on the BuzzFeed report: If true, "it’s the kind of thing that could get you impeached.”
|
|
|
Post by jld54 on Jan 18, 2019 18:43:16 GMT -5
Fox News' Chris Wallace on the BuzzFeed report: If true, "it’s the kind of thing that could get you impeached.” If, if, if...sigh And if queen had xxxxx, she would be king...
|
|
|
Post by jld54 on Jan 18, 2019 18:49:36 GMT -5
Fox News' Chris Wallace on the BuzzFeed report: If true, "it’s the kind of thing that could get you impeached.” Have you checked up on the dubious history of one of the authors? Caught twice for false reporting including that Dick Cheney was indicted! And the other author says that he had not seen any documentary proof but has sources well connected to Mueller. If the latter is true, why is Mueller team leaking to shady outfit like BuzzFeed?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2019 19:02:59 GMT -5
Fox News' Chris Wallace on the BuzzFeed report: If true, "it’s the kind of thing that could get you impeached.” Have you checked up on the dubious history of one of the authors? Caught twice for false reporting including that Dick Cheney was indicted! And the other author says that he had not seen any documentary proof but has sources well connected to Mueller. If the latter is true, why is Mueller team leaking to shady outfit like BuzzFeed? "False reporting"... What is your evidence that Mueller's team leaked to anyone? If the President is found to have committed multiple crimes what should be his punishment Mr. lawyer?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2019 19:09:30 GMT -5
Fox News' Chris Wallace on the BuzzFeed report: If true, "it’s the kind of thing that could get you impeached.” If, if, if...sigh And if queen had xxxxx, she would be king... You need a job?
|
|
|
Post by jld54 on Jan 18, 2019 19:21:11 GMT -5
Not to burst your bubbles, but check out the Columbia Journalism review about Buzz-Feed author Leopold: Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again archives.cjr.org/politics/jason_leopold_caught_sourceles.php"We wonder if the folks over at Truthout.org are rethinking their affiliation with reporter and s erial fabulist Jason Leopold. Leopold, you may recall, is the freelance reporter who w as caught making stuff up in a 2002 Salon.com article, self-admittedly “getting it completely wrong” in pieces for Dow Jones, and h ad his own memoir cancelled because of concerns over the accuracy of quotations." And who else but Mueller team would be leaking this, if the sources are so credible? Just saying...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2019 19:27:18 GMT -5
You posted OPINION articles from Jon Solomon and Kimberly Strassel. Neither have a stellar record for accuracy....
Notice how instead of smearing them, I showed their current work had flaws. Try doing the same.
|
|
|
Post by jld54 on Jan 18, 2019 19:57:44 GMT -5
BREAKING NEWS: CNN - Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.htmlSpecial counsel Robert Mueller's office is disputing a BuzzFeed report that President Donald Trump directed his then-personal attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about the proposed Moscow Trump Tower project. "BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate," said special counsel spokesman Peter Carr in a statement. Carr's statement is extremely rare. The special counsel's office has almost never commented on published stories.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2019 20:12:15 GMT -5
Breaking: I gues Mueller’s team didn’t leak to Buzzfeed despite previous claims.
It also looks like Mueller’s team is dedicated to treating people fairly and not some hack job like what’s been alleged in the last few pages.
|
|
|
Post by jld54 on Jan 18, 2019 21:09:15 GMT -5
Breaking: I gues Mueller’s team didn’t leak to Buzzfeed despite previous claims. It also looks like Mueller’s team is dedicated to treating people fairly and not some hack job like what’s been alleged in the last few pages. All day on this site and in the media the narrative was that the Buzzfeed story was the end of the line for the President. I did not see anyone here bother to look at the background of the author. A quick internet search showed that there were red flags about the author's credibility -- from the Columbia Review, hardly a right-wing source! Hence the "if', if, if...", and "if the queen had xxx, she'd be king" comment. How many times have there been "bombshells" that spell the end, etc., and then are quickly debunked? But people bite every single time. I submit that the media has so degraded itself in the past few years that its credibility is in serious doubt permanently.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2019 21:19:26 GMT -5
Breaking: I gues Mueller’s team didn’t leak to Buzzfeed despite previous claims. It also looks like Mueller’s team is dedicated to treating people fairly and not some hack job like what’s been alleged in the last few pages. All day on this site and in the media the narrative was that the Buzzfeed story was the end of the line for the President. I did not see anyone here bother to look at the background of the author. A quick internet search showed that there were red flags about the author's credibility -- from the Columbia Review, hardly a right-wing source! Hence the "if', if, if...", and "if the queen had xxx, she'd be king" comment. How many times have there been "bombshells" that spell the end, etc., and then are quickly debunked? But people bite every single time. I submit that the media has so degraded itself in the past few years that its credibility is in serious doubt permanently. You have posted a lot of things, and made a lot of allegations in this thread that are false. Who to believe shouldn’t be based on what you want to believe. It should be based upon truth. Mueller can’t be untrustworthy and tainted when you don’t like the info and trusted when you do. Clearly Mueller isn’t interested in spinning a narrative, he’s interested in the truth. Maybe think about that before you accuse him and others of acting unethically.
|
|
|
Post by jld54 on Jan 18, 2019 21:35:41 GMT -5
All I know is that you and many others here took at face value a report that had many red flags. I pointed out the questionable history of the author but many still defended the article. It said that Mueller has certain info; Mueller said no I don't.
I agree with your advice that who to believe should be based upon the truth. The truth is Trump through Giuliani denied the report and Mueller did as well. When the hunter and the hunted agree that the Buzzdfeed story is nonsense I believe that.
I have no posted a single statement that is not based on provable fact. I was told that the FBI investigation was not known before the election and was challenged to prove this with links. I then linked to the Corn and Isakoff articles which demonstrated this conclusively. So yes I can cite evidence to back up my statements.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2019 21:38:28 GMT -5
All I know is that you and many others here took at face value a report that had many red flags. I pointed out the questionable history of the author but many still defended the article. It said that Mueller has certain info; Mueller said no I don't. I agree with your advice that who to believe should be based upon the truth. The truth is Trump through Giuliani denied the report and Mueller did as well. When the hunter and the hunted agree that the Buzzdfeed story is nonsense I believe that. If if if... remember? Just a post above you accused Mueller of leaking to Buzzfeed based on nothing at all. Most of our posts are knocking down your weird conspiracy theories if you’re being honest with yourself.
|
|
|
Post by jld54 on Jan 18, 2019 21:44:28 GMT -5
All I know is that you and many others here took at face value a report that had many red flags. I pointed out the questionable history of the author but many still defended the article. It said that Mueller has certain info; Mueller said no I don't. I agree with your advice that who to believe should be based upon the truth. The truth is Trump through Giuliani denied the report and Mueller did as well. When the hunter and the hunted agree that the Buzzdfeed story is nonsense I believe that. If if if... remember? Just a post above you accused Mueller of leaking to Buzzfeed based on nothing at all. Most of our posts are knocking down your weird conspiracy theories if your being honest with yourself. Wrong. I stated that the article was likely false, but IF TRUE, then once must conclude that Mueller was leaking. My Initial statement was proven true, by Mueller no less, so the alternative that Mueller was leaking is false. You are, respectfully, twisting yourself in knots. Why not just write this off to premature joy over your fervently desired demise of Orange Man...?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2019 21:50:34 GMT -5
If if if... remember? Just a post above you accused Mueller of leaking to Buzzfeed based on nothing at all. Most of our posts are knocking down your weird conspiracy theories if your being honest with yourself. Wrong. I stated that the article was likely false, but IF TRUE, then once must conclude that Mueller was leaking. My Initial statement was proven true, by Mueller no less, so the alternative that Mueller was leaking is false. You are, respectfully, twisting yourself in knots. Why not just write this off to premature joy over your fervently desired demise of Orange Man...? Wrong. Hate to break the news to you but nobody here believes Republicans will vote to impeach Trump regardless of whatever he does. Mueller has integrity and is simply following where the facts lead. Remember that.
|
|
hoya9797
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 4,219
|
Post by hoya9797 on Jan 18, 2019 22:08:24 GMT -5
The only way Trump isn’t president after 2020 is if he dies. No chance he gets removed via impeachment, no chance he resigns, and no chance his true believers abandon him. So, let’s all hope for a massive heart attack soon.
|
|
|
Post by jld54 on Jan 18, 2019 22:24:45 GMT -5
The only way Trump isn’t president after 2020 is if he dies. No chance he gets removed via impeachment, no chance he resigns, and no chance his true believers abandon him. So, let’s all hope for a massive heart attack soon. Yes, let’s blow up the White House, Madonna. 👍🎉🍺
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,477
|
Post by TC on Jan 18, 2019 22:40:34 GMT -5
BREAKING NEWS: CNN - Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.htmlSpecial counsel Robert Mueller's office is disputing a BuzzFeed report that President Donald Trump directed his then-personal attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about the proposed Moscow Trump Tower project. "BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate," said special counsel spokesman Peter Carr in a statement. Carr's statement is extremely rare. The special counsel's office has almost never commented on published stories. Weren't you just complaining about Mueller "leaking" (with no proof)? Now he makes a public statement, and you are bandying it about because it supports your point.
|
|
|
Post by jld54 on Jan 19, 2019 8:11:12 GMT -5
BREAKING NEWS: CNN - Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.htmlSpecial counsel Robert Mueller's office is disputing a BuzzFeed report that President Donald Trump directed his then-personal attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about the proposed Moscow Trump Tower project. "BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate," said special counsel spokesman Peter Carr in a statement. Carr's statement is extremely rare. The special counsel's office has almost never commented on published stories. Weren't you just complaining about Mueller "leaking" (with no proof)? Now he makes a public statement, and you are bandying it about because it supports your point. I did not allege that Mueller was leaking, my statement was IF the story was true, his office had to be leaking, since the bogus sources were “people with knowledge of his investigation”. It turns out, as suspected, that the story was false, hence Mueller was not leaking. This is simple logic and nothing else. As stated above you are twisting yourself into pretzels. You all lapped up a BS story without question due to your hatred of Trump. The Columbia Journal stated well before this article that one of the authors was a “serial fabulist”, yet the board attacked in unison when I stated that there may be red flags. Did you ever stop to ask that if Trump suborned perjury, would Cohen be going to prison for years? Wouldn’t PROVEN subornation of perjury have caused Mueller to offer a much better deal, likely total immunity? Incidents like have happened time and time again over the past 2 to 3 years. Without exception, every story that is proven false is, of course, an anti– Trump story. Do you understand that when these things happen, and orange man screams “fake news”, he is correct? The publication of these lies and the spin of them in the media/Democratic Party echo chamber actually helps Trump. For instance, CNN ran this story nonstop all day yesterday. It was the lead story on all the TV shows. And, the headline yesterday in the New York Times was that the Democratic House announced that it will investigate this story. Now, not only does BuzzFeed have egg on his face, but so do CNN, the networks, and the Democrats. At this point this is very little about Trump and really about the degradation of the media. The legacy media is essentially propaganda— mainly for the left, but also with Fox propaganda on the right. One would think that a legacy media with any sense of self respect would verify a story, and make sure that it was air tight before publishing something that could arguably take down the president of the United States. But no, we have a 24 hour which went “Trump will be impeached” to “never mind“.
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,686
|
Post by Elvado on Jan 19, 2019 8:26:28 GMT -5
Mueller’s statement is much more interesting for what it does not say. Any Trump camp member taking solace in that statement is whistling past the graveyard.
It is in no way any type of exoneration.
|
|