SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 19,142
|
Post by SSHoya on Dec 4, 2017 14:23:59 GMT -5
^ NBC: The president's lawyer claims he drafted the president's tweet, and then sent it to White House social media director to publish as the president. Like Mueller's not going to go for the server logs and prove it came from Trump's iPhone. These people are so dumb. John Dowd is 76 years old. If you mention "server log" to him he probably thinks it is something used to start a campfire.
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 19,142
|
Post by SSHoya on Dec 4, 2017 18:04:15 GMT -5
|
|
hoyarooter
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,434
|
Post by hoyarooter on Dec 4, 2017 20:27:06 GMT -5
^ NBC: The president's lawyer claims he drafted the president's tweet, and then sent it to White House social media director to publish as the president. When asked for the original email he sent to aide, the president's lawyer claimed he dictated it orally. LOL.... President is above the law according to his lawyer..... No reason to make this type of claim unless you think there's a strong case to made that he did. Somewhere the Trickster is nodding his head vigorously and smiling, and thinking, "but it didn't work for me."
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 19,142
|
Post by SSHoya on Dec 5, 2017 6:59:02 GMT -5
|
|
Elvado
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 6,080
|
Post by Elvado on Dec 5, 2017 9:48:31 GMT -5
It can’t be true that the agent just removed from the probe, who hates Trump and has texted to that effect, was also the one who edited out the “gross negligence” finding and presided over the HRC, Huma and Mills interviews, can it?
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,477
|
Post by TC on Dec 5, 2017 10:42:31 GMT -5
It can’t be true that the agent just removed from the probe, who hates Trump and has texted to that effect, was also the one who edited out the “gross negligence” finding and presided over the HRC, Huma and Mills interviews, can it? Half the people who voted for him hate Trump.
|
|
Elvado
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 6,080
|
Post by Elvado on Dec 5, 2017 10:46:54 GMT -5
It can’t be true that the agent just removed from the probe, who hates Trump and has texted to that effect, was also the one who edited out the “gross negligence” finding and presided over the HRC, Huma and Mills interviews, can it? Half the people who voted for him hate Trump. I’ll take that as a yes. Doesn’t mean anything but what a crazy coincidence.
|
|
blueeagle
Bulldog (over 250 posts)
Win or lose, it's the school we choose.
Posts: 498
|
Post by blueeagle on Dec 5, 2017 11:15:43 GMT -5
One investigation has concluded. Another one is ongoing. Let's see where this new investigation takes us. Afterwards, we can revisit the old investigation if there are questions unanswered. Because, you know, Hillary. And she IS the problem (to some people). Just amazing.
By the way, the Mueller investigation has cost about $3.2 million dollars so far. Seems like a bargain if his findings can lead to the prevention of policies that may cost the country $1.5 trillion over a 10 year period. A rising tide raises all yachts!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2017 11:44:53 GMT -5
Half the people who voted for him hate Trump. I’ll take that as a yes. Doesn’t mean anything but what a crazy coincidence. The Hillary Clinton presidency is in deep trouble....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2017 12:01:52 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2017 12:12:46 GMT -5
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,477
|
Post by TC on Dec 5, 2017 12:46:59 GMT -5
Half the people who voted for him hate Trump. I’ll take that as a yes. Doesn’t mean anything but what a crazy coincidence. Then why post it? It's a smear attempt at a federal agent to defend a criminal President.
|
|
Elvado
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 6,080
|
Post by Elvado on Dec 5, 2017 12:57:13 GMT -5
And that is the real sin. Hamstringing the customarily robust response from Obama. Funny how he sat on the meddling until after Hillary lost. One would think such an attack on American Democracy would require, if not demand, an immediate response. Perhaps it was not the attack on Democracy, but rather the attack on Democrat which upset him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2017 13:11:19 GMT -5
And that is the real sin. Hamstringing the customarily robust response from Obama. Funny how he sat on the meddling until after Hillary lost. One would think such an attack on American Democracy would require, if not demand, an immediate response. Perhaps it was not the attack on Democracy, but rather the attack on Democrat which upset him. Never change Elvado..... America First...
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 19,142
|
Post by SSHoya on Dec 5, 2017 13:15:40 GMT -5
And that is the real sin. Hamstringing the customarily robust response from Obama. Funny how he sat on the meddling until after Hillary lost. One would think such an attack on American Democracy would require, if not demand, an immediate response. Perhaps it was not the attack on Democracy, but rather the attack on Democrat which upset him. Never change Elvado..... America First... No, it's Первая Америка!!!
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 19,142
|
Post by SSHoya on Dec 5, 2017 13:29:19 GMT -5
A minor factual issue. Obama did not sit on the response until after the election. The USIC issued its finding on Russian interference and offered assistance to states regarding election security in October 2016: www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-nationalWhile one may quarrel with the robustness of the response, it was on the radar screen and the level of the interference at that time was still substantially unknown. Furthermore, some states were suspicious of the federal government's offer of assistance since everything ever done by Obama was a federal power grab: But Georgia’s top election official is balking at the offers of assistance — and accusing the Obama administration of using exaggerated warnings of cyberthreats to intrude on states’ authority. Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp’s objections add to a bumpy start for the Department of Homeland Security’s attempt to shore up safeguards for the election, during a summer when cyberattacks on the Democratic National Committee have called attention to weaknesses across the electoral system. Cybersecurity experts call tougher protections long overdue for parties, political advocacy groups and voting machinery, but DHS’ efforts risk becoming caught in the same partisan arguments about state sovereignty that have hung up programs such as President Barack Obama’s Medicaid expansion. www.politico.com/story/2016/08/election-cyber-security-georgia-227475
|
|
Elvado
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 6,080
|
Post by Elvado on Dec 5, 2017 13:33:22 GMT -5
And that is the real sin. Hamstringing the customarily robust response from Obama. Funny how he sat on the meddling until after Hillary lost. One would think such an attack on American Democracy would require, if not demand, an immediate response. Perhaps it was not the attack on Democracy, but rather the attack on Democrat which upset him. Never change Elvado..... America First... At my advanced age, there is little chance of change
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 19,142
|
Post by SSHoya on Dec 6, 2017 10:38:13 GMT -5
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 19,142
|
Post by SSHoya on Dec 6, 2017 16:22:32 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2017 11:05:47 GMT -5
|
|