Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2018 20:30:54 GMT -5
[b Real courage there. Own it or shut it. Would the Times have published this on a Democrat? Of course they would, if the Democrat president was as unhinged as Trump. And please don't go referring to Obama or Bubba now. We're talking about another galaxy here. Well, Fox News seemed to think Obama was unhinged. Remember that time when he wore a tan suit? And that other time when he put Dijon mustard on his burger? I'm sure the NYT would have sought out an anonymous source in the Obama administration on those things, if only they weren't so biased.
|
|
|
Post by flyoverhoya on Sept 6, 2018 9:01:15 GMT -5
[b Real courage there. Own it or shut it. Would the Times have published this on a Democrat? Wouldn't need to. A Democratic president doing half of what Trump has done to date would have already been impeached, tried, and removed from office.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2018 9:16:11 GMT -5
Blame falls squarely at the feet of a GOP Congress’s absolute failure to check the President. They won’t check him, they're enablers. They don't deserve their jobs...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2018 9:25:07 GMT -5
Why would this email be considered "committee confidential?"
Is it a matter of national security, is personal information being leaked here?
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,692
|
Post by Elvado on Sept 6, 2018 10:48:20 GMT -5
Why would this email be considered "committee confidential?" Is it a matter of national security, is personal information being leaked here? Is the Irony of a member of the Judiciary Committee willfully violating Senate rules lost on everyone? Cory Booker is above the rules and the law. Ladies and gentlemen, your Democratic nominee presumptive.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2018 11:37:10 GMT -5
Why would this email be considered "committee confidential?" Is it a matter of national security, is personal information being leaked here? Ladies and gentlemen, your Democratic nominee presumptive. Wait, I thought that was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez? Things move fast these days.
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,477
|
Post by TC on Sept 6, 2018 12:29:44 GMT -5
Cory Booker is above the rules and the law. Ladies and gentlemen, your Democratic nominee presumptive. I'm not a lawyer, but it appears to me like he's breaking Senate rules, not laws. If he's breaking a law, what law is that? Other rules being broken: - hiding these documents - putting them under the heading of national security when they are clearly being hid for partisan and political purpose
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,477
|
Post by TC on Sept 6, 2018 12:51:02 GMT -5
LOL new Republican position, Booker isn't breaking any laws or rules :
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,477
|
Post by TC on Sept 6, 2018 13:02:32 GMT -5
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,692
|
Post by Elvado on Sept 6, 2018 13:17:56 GMT -5
So the takeaway is as follows:
1. Documents never should have been withheld 2. Corey Booker is either very brave or the biggest fake in Washington DC 3. Kavanaugh will be confirmed because as BO said, elections have consequences
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,477
|
Post by TC on Sept 6, 2018 14:32:25 GMT -5
So the takeaway is as follows: 1. Documents never should have been withheld 3. Kavanaugh will be confirmed because as BO said, elections have consequences If 3 then why 1?
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,692
|
Post by Elvado on Sept 6, 2018 14:46:47 GMT -5
So the takeaway is as follows: 1. Documents never should have been withheld 3. Kavanaugh will be confirmed because as BO said, elections have consequences If 3 then why 1? Agreed. There is nothing in those 12 documents of any import anyway. He favored race-neutral law enforcement and did not believe it was accurate to say “legal scholars consider Roe settled law”. So what?
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,477
|
Post by TC on Sept 6, 2018 15:13:00 GMT -5
Agreed. There is nothing in those 12 documents of any import anyway. He favored race-neutral law enforcement and did not believe it was accurate to say “legal scholars consider Roe settled law”. So what? So why : - were they marked confidential - were you up in arms five posts before this about Booker "breaking rules and laws" in releasing them - did Cornyn threaten to boot Booker from the Senate Republicans are hiding this stuff and only because Booker pushed back are they releasing them, because they don't want to have to explain why they were marked confidential for no good reason. To add to that, they seem to be lying about the 4 AM release of them and trying to blame it all on Booker. It must be very confusing keeping track of what lies are your current talking points.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2018 15:22:43 GMT -5
2. Corey Booker is either very brave or the biggest fake in Washington DCIt's amazing how frequently Republicans forget about their guy in the Oval Office.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2018 16:31:29 GMT -5
Why would this email be considered "committee confidential?" Is it a matter of national security, is personal information being leaked here? Is the Irony of a member of the Judiciary Committee willfully violating Senate rules lost on everyone? Cory Booker is above the rules and the law. Ladies and gentlemen, your Democratic nominee presumptive. Lol...Grassley and the Republicans are making up the rules as they go along... Those documents belong to the American Public, they don't belong to the Republicans on the Judiciary committee.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2018 16:45:55 GMT -5
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,692
|
Post by Elvado on Sept 6, 2018 16:51:04 GMT -5
Democrat Nominee Checklist 2020
Young Hip Feckless Progressive Empty Suit
He has it all...
|
|
hoyarooter
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,448
|
Post by hoyarooter on Sept 6, 2018 19:08:01 GMT -5
Republican Nominee Checklist 2020
Constant liar Fraud Bully Sexual abuser Criminal Putin lap dog All around scum bag Just scratching the surface, but definitely checks all the boxes
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,692
|
Post by Elvado on Sept 6, 2018 19:28:00 GMT -5
Republican Nominee Checklist 2020 Constant liar Fraud Bully Sexual abuser Criminal Putin lap dog All around scum bag Just scratching the surface, but definitely checks all the boxes The Republicans are nominating Bill Clinton?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2018 19:39:18 GMT -5
Definitely not a Trump supporter...
|
|