EasyEd
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 7,272
|
Post by EasyEd on Sept 1, 2018 13:19:08 GMT -5
|
|
hoya9797
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 4,201
|
Post by hoya9797 on Sept 14, 2018 7:49:33 GMT -5
|
|
hoya9797
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 4,201
|
Post by hoya9797 on Sept 14, 2018 10:10:33 GMT -5
|
|
hoya9797
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 4,201
|
Post by hoya9797 on Sept 16, 2018 21:26:51 GMT -5
|
|
hoya9797
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 4,201
|
Post by hoya9797 on Sept 29, 2018 20:28:12 GMT -5
|
|
prhoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 23,240
|
Post by prhoya on Sept 29, 2018 20:43:53 GMT -5
|
|
hoya9797
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 4,201
|
Post by hoya9797 on Sept 29, 2018 21:25:13 GMT -5
Gotta hand it to them, the church will do just about anything to avoid actually doing anything about this. The commitment to the cover up is impressive.
|
|
hoya9797
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 4,201
|
Post by hoya9797 on Oct 5, 2018 20:54:25 GMT -5
This latest one is a doozy. www.thedailybeast.com/the-sex-abuse-of-deaf-orphans-in-pope-francis-backyardSixty seven boys living in an Italian school for the deaf were abused by more than two dozen priests. Here’s what one boy said happened: Sadly, this is pretty standard stuff these days. Where it gets interesting is when we find out that these guys were shipped off to a sister school in Argentina where they kept going with the abuse. When they were caught there, Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergolio, you probably know him as Pope Francis, took over and made sure the complaints went nowhere, transferred the priests out, and the cover up was preserved. Nice church you’ve got there.
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 18,214
|
Post by SSHoya on Oct 12, 2018 5:14:05 GMT -5
|
|
hoyarooter
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,179
|
Post by hoyarooter on Oct 12, 2018 20:00:35 GMT -5
I'm not Catholic, so have no personal stake in this, but can't help being repulsed by these goings on. Just curious, how would you all feel about removing the celibacy requirement?
|
|
DFW HOYA
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 5,728
|
Post by DFW HOYA on Oct 12, 2018 20:44:48 GMT -5
I'm not Catholic, so have no personal stake in this, but can't help being repulsed by these goings on. Just curious, how would you all feel about removing the celibacy requirement? I would not conflate celibacy with a proclivity for abuse. There are lots of cases in society (be they rabbis, scout masters, doctors, etc.) that are equally heinous and do not involve celibacy as a contributing factor. We would not suggest, for example, that celibate people are more likely to commit sexual assaults of adults. There is a related though distinct conversation regarding married clergy. This was phased out in the Middle Ages as monasteries predominated over parishes and, among other things, stone fortreesed monasteries were no place for a family and they could not afford additional people there on the meager farming wages they earned. I do not think the monastic or mendicant orders are any more prepared to take this on in the 21st Century than they were in the 11th Century, nor too, the Jesuits, which are designed to be a missionary order and not one that brings along others. Where it may be more feasible would be diocesan priests along the lines of permanent deacons: a deacon can be ordained single or married, but cannot marry or remarry once they are ordained; hence, almost all deacons arrive married and stay that way. FWIW, my parish was blessed for 15 years with a married Catholic priest by way of a conversion from the Episcopal priesthood. A great man and a great teacher. Some of the newer parishioners did not even know he lived with his family lived down the street and not at the rectory. This parish could afford the house and the upkeep, but not all parishes might be able to.
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,473
|
Post by Elvado on Oct 13, 2018 5:40:58 GMT -5
I'm not Catholic, so have no personal stake in this, but can't help being repulsed by these goings on. Just curious, how would you all feel about removing the celibacy requirement? I would not conflate celibacy with a proclivity for abuse. There are lots of cases in society (be they rabbis, scout masters, doctors, etc.) that are equally heinous and do not involve celibacy as a contributing factor. We would not suggest, for example, that celibate people are more likely to commit sexual assaults of adults. There is a related though distinct conversation regarding married clergy. This was phased out in the Middle Ages as monasteries predominated over parishes and, among other things, stone fortreesed monasteries were no place for a family and they could not afford additional people there on the meager farming wages they earned. I do not think the monastic or mendicant orders are any more prepared to take this on in the 21st Century than they were in the 11th Century, nor too, the Jesuits, which are designed to be a missionary order and not one that brings along others. Where it may be more feasible would be diocesan priests along the lines of permanent deacons: a deacon can be ordained single or married, but cannot marry or remarry once they are ordained; hence, almost all deacons arrive married and stay that way. FWIW, my parish was blessed for 15 years with a married Catholic priest by way of a conversion from the Episcopal priesthood. A great man and a great teacher. Some of the newer parishioners did not even know he lived with his family lived down the street and not at the rectory. This parish could afford the house and the upkeep, but not all parishes might be able to. Echoing some of what DFW said, there is no direct correlation beteeen celibacy and any proclivity for abuse. My issue with the celibacy requirement goes hand in hand with my objection to the exclusion of women from the priesthood and is much more practical in nature. To wit: as currently constituted the Catholic Church is narrowing its talent pool for the priesthood so substantially as to lose out on wonderful candidates for God’s work. The concept of the unmarried clergy is an artifice of man designed to preserve Church wealth. It is time for that to go along with the exclusion of women. Is this change a silver bullet against abuse? Who knows? I do know the Church will be more vibrant and better for the changes.
|
|
hoya9797
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 4,201
|
Post by hoya9797 on Oct 13, 2018 8:33:53 GMT -5
Celibate or married clergy has nothing to do with covering up rape.
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,473
|
Post by Elvado on Oct 13, 2018 8:36:54 GMT -5
Celibate or married clergy has nothing to do with covering up rape. Agreed. However, steps to prevent future occurrences are a good idea no?
|
|
hoya9797
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 4,201
|
Post by hoya9797 on Oct 13, 2018 10:31:30 GMT -5
How is allowing married clergy going to reduce abuse? What are you saying about these unmarried men that makes them more likely to abuse kids?
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,473
|
Post by Elvado on Oct 13, 2018 10:34:56 GMT -5
How is allowing married clergy going to reduce abuse? What are you saying about these unmarried men that makes them more likely to abuse kids? Changing the overall composition of the clergy pool should change the frequency of abuse. My overarching point is that the unmarried male only clergy is anachronistic, artificially imposed and counter productive. You hate the Church and organized religion so no step will satisfy you. We all get it. Carry on.
|
|
hoya9797
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 4,201
|
Post by hoya9797 on Oct 13, 2018 11:40:06 GMT -5
How is allowing married clergy going to reduce abuse? What are you saying about these unmarried men that makes them more likely to abuse kids? Changing the overall composition of the clergy pool should change the frequency of abuse. Why?
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,440
Member is Online
|
Post by TC on Oct 13, 2018 17:19:44 GMT -5
Echoing some of what DFW said, there is no direct correlation beteeen celibacy and any proclivity for abuse. Given the rates of coverup / moving people around / denying the problem, I don't think anyone can really make that claim. We have no idea what the real rate is, whether celibacy is directly an issue in creating sexual abuse or whether a policy of enforced mandatory celibacy so limits the pool that you screen in a great number of abusers. Bringing up the existence of sexual abuse by Boy Scout Leaders, or by Republican Speakers of the House, or Dentists doesn't prove or disprove anything other than to say it's a problem for every institution.
|
|
hoya95
Golden Hoya (over 1000 posts)
Posts: 1,445
|
Post by hoya95 on Oct 15, 2018 16:49:17 GMT -5
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 18,214
|
Post by SSHoya on Oct 17, 2018 6:06:03 GMT -5
|
|