Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,478
|
Post by Elvado on Oct 15, 2018 6:30:11 GMT -5
In yet another display of Democrat Party bad judgment, Beto O’Rourke asked a Kennedy to drive him around on the campaign trail...
Brave guy...
Hope there were no narrow bridges...
|
|
ksf42001
Silver Hoya (over 500 posts)
Posts: 901
|
Post by ksf42001 on Oct 15, 2018 6:46:32 GMT -5
In yet another display of Democrat Party bad judgment, Beto O’Rourke asked a Kennedy to drive him around on the campaign trail... Brave guy... Hope there were no narrow bridges... For what you believe was a horrible miscarriage of justice (I don't disagree), you seem to joke about Chappaquiddick a lot. Do you tell Martha Moxley jokes too?
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,478
|
Post by Elvado on Oct 15, 2018 7:09:04 GMT -5
In yet another display of Democrat Party bad judgment, Beto O’Rourke asked a Kennedy to drive him around on the campaign trail... Brave guy... Hope there were no narrow bridges... For what you believe was a horrible miscarriage of justice (I don't disagree), you seem to joke about Chappaquiddick a lot. Do you tell Martha Moxley jokes too? One could spend a lifetime talking about the Kennedys and the lives they and their clan have destroyed. However, the Moxley murder was not committed by a Sitting US Senator and icon of the Democrat Party.
|
|
tashoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 12,318
|
Post by tashoya on Oct 15, 2018 7:36:21 GMT -5
Remind me which offices Hillary and Bill currently hold?
|
|
SSHoya
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
"Forget it Jake, it's Chinatown."
Posts: 18,245
|
Post by SSHoya on Oct 15, 2018 7:45:38 GMT -5
Trumpean troll post to distract from the horrendous 60 Minutes interview of Don the Con last night. Nothing of substance to offer, as usual. See e.g., President Trump says he knows more about the North Atlantic Treaty Organization than Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis. "Frankly, I like Gen. Mattis. I think I know more about it than he does," Trump said during an interview with CBS News' "60 Minutes" that aired Sunday. "And I know more about it from the standpoint of fairness, that I can tell you." www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-i-know-more-about-nato-than-defense-secretary-jim-mattis
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,478
|
Post by Elvado on Oct 15, 2018 7:57:16 GMT -5
Remind me which offices Hillary and Bill currently hold? Just commenting upon what CBS deems news. I didn’t schedule her sit down.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2018 8:06:00 GMT -5
For what you believe was a horrible miscarriage of justice (I don't disagree), you seem to joke about Chappaquiddick a lot. Do you tell Martha Moxley jokes too? One could spend a lifetime talking about the Kennedys and the lives they and their clan have destroyed. However, the Moxley murder was not committed by a Sitting US Senator and icon of the Democrat Party. Brett Kavanaugh should not be held responsible for things he did 35 years ago, but all Democrats should be held responsible for something that one Democrat did 50 years ago.
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,478
|
Post by Elvado on Oct 15, 2018 8:08:56 GMT -5
One could spend a lifetime talking about the Kennedys and the lives they and their clan have destroyed. However, the Moxley murder was not committed by a Sitting US Senator and icon of the Democrat Party. Brett Kavanaugh should not be held responsible for things he did 35 years ago, but all Democrats should be held responsible for something that one Democrat did 50 years ago. Who said Kavanaugh should not be responsible for what he did? He should not however be responsible for what Democrats and their supporters have fantasized.
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,441
|
Post by TC on Oct 15, 2018 9:30:59 GMT -5
Brett Kavanaugh should not be held responsible for things he did 35 years ago, but all Democrats should be held responsible for something that one Democrat did 50 years ago. Who said Kavanaugh should not be responsible for what he did? The Republican Party did by voting him, in covering up everything he did, withholding and misclassifying docs, and doing a sham investigation to pretend that the accusations were "uncorroborated".
|
|
EtomicB
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 14,842
|
Post by EtomicB on Oct 15, 2018 9:42:56 GMT -5
Brett Kavanaugh should not be held responsible for things he did 35 years ago, but all Democrats should be held responsible for something that one Democrat did 50 years ago. Who said Kavanaugh should not be responsible for what he did? He should not however be responsible for what Democrats and their supporters have fantasized. Did folks in the Democratic party fantasize Kavanaugh's numerous lies under oath?
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,478
|
Post by Elvado on Oct 15, 2018 9:49:43 GMT -5
Who said Kavanaugh should not be responsible for what he did? The Republican Party did by voting him, in covering up everything he did, withholding and misclassifying docs, and doing a sham investigation to pretend that the accusations were "uncorroborated". The absence of corroborating evidence is seared into my hippocampus
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,441
|
Post by TC on Oct 15, 2018 10:10:19 GMT -5
The Republican Party did by voting him, in covering up everything he did, withholding and misclassifying docs, and doing a sham investigation to pretend that the accusations were "uncorroborated". The absence of corroborating evidence is seared into my hippocampus Can't find it if you completely obstruct the FBI!
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,478
|
Post by Elvado on Oct 15, 2018 10:28:26 GMT -5
The absence of corroborating evidence is seared into my hippocampus Can't find it if you completely obstruct the FBI! Or if it never happened and your complainant is a crackpot...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2018 10:35:50 GMT -5
Might have the answer to that if the FBI was allowed to investigate... They were not allowed to investigate.
What part did I get wrong?
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,441
|
Post by TC on Oct 15, 2018 10:38:55 GMT -5
It doesn't matter what the truth is because the Republican talking points position is seared into his hippocampus.
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,478
|
Post by Elvado on Oct 15, 2018 10:41:40 GMT -5
Might have the answer to that if the FBI was allowed to investigate... They were not allowed to investigate. What part did I get wrong? Did they not speak with everyone she identified as having been there? Or is my hippocampus out of whack?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2018 10:44:15 GMT -5
Might have the answer to that if the FBI was allowed to investigate... They were not allowed to investigate. What part did I get wrong? Did they not speak with everyone she identified as having been there? Or is my hippocampus out of whack? Not saying it's out of whack but by "everyone" you mean everyone not named Christine Blasey Ford or Brett Kavanaugh, correct? Let's start there, and if you want I can continue...
|
|
Elvado
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 10,478
|
Post by Elvado on Oct 15, 2018 10:46:26 GMT -5
Did they not speak with everyone she identified as having been there? Or is my hippocampus out of whack? Not saying it's out of whack but by "everyone" you mean everyone not named Christine Blasey Ford or Brett Kavanaugh, correct? Right. Every person without a stake in the investigation was interviewed and none, as in not one, could corroborate her claim.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2018 10:54:28 GMT -5
Not saying it's out of whack but by "everyone" you mean everyone not named Christine Blasey Ford or Brett Kavanaugh, correct? Right. Every person without a stake in the investigation was interviewed and none, as in not one, could corroborate her claim. That's still NOT TRUE but let's stick to the first point. I'm confused because you said: Is that true? Or are you moving goal posts to your desired destination? I don't know, maybe it's just me, but I think NOT interviewing the victim and accuser are some pretty big ommissions. I also think those are two people she identified as "having been there".
|
|
TC
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 9,441
|
Post by TC on Oct 15, 2018 10:54:41 GMT -5
Did they not speak with everyone she identified as having been there? LOL, they didn't interview Kavanaugh or Ford, or either Ford or Ramirez's witness lists, so yeah, I'll go with "no, they did not interview everyone she identified as being there". They didn't even interview all of the people that Kavanaugh said were at the July 1st party. time.com/5415845/kavanaugh-fbi-investigation-witnesses/
|
|