Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2016 22:41:13 GMT -5
You guys know this stuff way better than I. The more places he visits after leaving town...the less likely we get him? Not really... Don't think he has an offer yet. In home was probably at his school not his home home in Texas
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastteddy58 on Mar 22, 2016 22:41:41 GMT -5
Where is he from/where's home? I think I seen something that said he was from New Orleans
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2016 22:42:08 GMT -5
Wesson's brother is a OSU signee for 2017 visiting Butler this weekend. Think they have 1 scholly left but not too sure have to chk..
|
|
deacon
Golden Hoya (over 1000 posts)
Posts: 1,850
Member is Online
|
Post by deacon on Mar 23, 2016 0:07:52 GMT -5
You guys know this stuff way better than I. The more places he visits after leaving town...the less likely we get him? You never really know, each recruit is different. All you can ever do is put your best foot forward and keep on him until he flat out tells you "no" or he just commits somewhere else.
|
|
EtomicB
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 14,822
Member is Online
|
Post by EtomicB on Mar 23, 2016 7:31:18 GMT -5
Wesson's brother is a OSU signee for 2017 visiting Butler this weekend. Think they have 1 scholly left but not too sure have to chk.. They only have 1 spot left right now..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2016 9:25:37 GMT -5
Wesson's brother is a OSU signee for 2017 visiting Butler this weekend. Think they have 1 scholly left but not too sure have to chk.. They only have 1 spot left right now.. Looks like they prefer Wesson to Mulmore since one has an offer and one does not.. Not clear they would push someone out for Mulmore..
|
|
EtomicB
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 14,822
Member is Online
|
Post by EtomicB on Mar 23, 2016 9:57:22 GMT -5
They only have 1 spot left right now.. Looks like they prefer Wesson to Mulmore since one has an offer and one does not.. Not clear they would push someone out for Mulmore.. I think Wesson will give a serious look to Butler, a program that's been on him for awhile.. So I think OSU is hedging their bets..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2016 10:12:44 GMT -5
Looks like they prefer Wesson to Mulmore since one has an offer and one does not.. Not clear they would push someone out for Mulmore.. I think Wesson will give a serious look to Butler, a program that's been on him for awhile.. So I think OSU is hedging their bets.. Butler offered in late Feb they've only been on him this year... Plans to visit in the "Coming weeks" He may never make it if the offer from OSU is legit. Pops is an alumni and Brother is a 2017 signee. The lead assistant in his recruitment is the same lead for Mulmore btw.. But u never know recruiting is never an exact science as you know..
|
|
Hoyas4Ever
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
A Wise Man Once Told Me Don't Argue With Fools....
Posts: 5,448
|
Post by Hoyas4Ever on Mar 28, 2016 23:33:06 GMT -5
|
|
EtomicB
Blue & Gray (over 10,000 posts)
Posts: 14,822
Member is Online
|
Post by EtomicB on Mar 29, 2016 18:46:17 GMT -5
Plenty of spots open for next season now @ Ohio State.. We'll see how it shakes out as far as JM is concerned..
|
|
dreamhoya
Golden Hoya (over 1000 posts)
Posts: 2,259
|
Post by dreamhoya on Mar 29, 2016 21:24:26 GMT -5
I'd prefer Hosch over Mulmore. Too bad for me.
|
|
Hoyas4Ever
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
A Wise Man Once Told Me Don't Argue With Fools....
Posts: 5,448
|
Post by Hoyas4Ever on Mar 30, 2016 0:23:40 GMT -5
Plenty of spots open for next season now @ Ohio State.. We'll see how it shakes out as far as JM is concerned.. I always wonder why a recruit with options would go to a school who's in the midst of a mass exodus of players transferring like Ohio State, NC St., or USC are currently having or like Louisville had last year. One transfer per year per program has unfortunately become the norm. Two transfers in this college basketball climate can be explained and isn't too shocking but when you have 3, 4, 5 plus transfers in a season, as a recruit, you think it would remove a school with that many kids leaving from consideration. I'm not talking about situations that involve a coaching change and the coach who recruited you is no longer on campus. I'm not talking about 5th year free agents as that is a given right that by rule they can explore but when you have freshmen and sophomores leaving, as a prospect considering that school you would have to ask why? You know what the coaching staff is telling you is the same things he told those players who running away from or being pushed out the door of the program just a year or two ago. How could you trust the coach to be honest with you. I'm not saying the coaches flat out lied to the kids leaving. I'm also not saying the coach didn't just flat out lie and the kids entered school with unrealistic expectations. It's probably 65/35 that the coaches lied especially if the players who's now transferring was heavily recruited by several schools before committing to the schools they are now leaving. I know kids always think it won't be me, but if a coach is turning over 25-40% of his roster from transfers as he is recruiting you or a year or 2 before you make your decision then you gotta know there is a good chance in the next couple years you could be next out the door. It just baffles me how many kids commit to a school shortly after a mass exodus of underclassman players via the transfer.
|
|
Hoyas4Ever
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
A Wise Man Once Told Me Don't Argue With Fools....
Posts: 5,448
|
Post by Hoyas4Ever on Mar 30, 2016 1:43:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dungeon ball on Mar 30, 2016 7:19:26 GMT -5
Plenty of spots open for next season now @ Ohio State.. We'll see how it shakes out as far as JM is concerned.. I always wonder why a recruit with options would go to a school who's in the midst of a mass exodus of players transferring like Ohio State, NC St., or USC are currently having or like Louisville had last year. One transfer per year per program has unfortunately become the norm. Two transfers in this college basketball climate can be explained and isn't too shocking but when you have 3, 4, 5 plus transfers in a season, as a recruit, you think it would remove a school with that many kids leaving from consideration. I'm not talking about situations that involve a coaching change and the coach who recruited you is no longer on campus. I'm not talking about 5th year free agents as that is a given right that by rule they can explore but when you have freshmen and sophomores leaving, as a prospect considering that school you would have to ask why? You know what the coaching staff is telling you is the same things he told those players who running away from or being pushed out the door of the program just a year or two ago. How could you trust the coach to be honest with you. I'm not saying the coaches flat out lied to the kids leaving. I'm also not saying the coach didn't just flat out lie and the kids entered school with unrealistic expectations. It's probably 65/35 that the coaches lied especially if the players who's now transferring was heavily recruited by several schools before committing to the schools they are now leaving. I know kids always think it won't be me, but if a coach is turning over 25-40% of his roster from transfers as he is recruiting you or a year or 2 before you make your decision then you gotta know there is a good chance in the next couple years you could be next out the door. It just baffles me how many kids commit to a school shortly after a mass exodus of underclassman players via the transfer. I get your point, but Maryland got a lot better after a bunch of players transferred away. Sometimes it signals more of a change of direction for a coach, rather than an indictment against him
|
|
Hoyas4Ever
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
A Wise Man Once Told Me Don't Argue With Fools....
Posts: 5,448
|
Post by Hoyas4Ever on Mar 30, 2016 10:43:39 GMT -5
I always wonder why a recruit with options would go to a school who's in the midst of a mass exodus of players transferring like Ohio State, NC St., or USC are currently having or like Louisville had last year. One transfer per year per program has unfortunately become the norm. Two transfers in this college basketball climate can be explained and isn't too shocking but when you have 3, 4, 5 plus transfers in a season, as a recruit, you think it would remove a school with that many kids leaving from consideration. I'm not talking about situations that involve a coaching change and the coach who recruited you is no longer on campus. I'm not talking about 5th year free agents as that is a given right that by rule they can explore but when you have freshmen and sophomores leaving, as a prospect considering that school you would have to ask why? You know what the coaching staff is telling you is the same things he told those players who running away from or being pushed out the door of the program just a year or two ago. How could you trust the coach to be honest with you. I'm not saying the coaches flat out lied to the kids leaving. I'm also not saying the coach didn't just flat out lie and the kids entered school with unrealistic expectations. It's probably 65/35 that the coaches lied especially if the players who's now transferring was heavily recruited by several schools before committing to the schools they are now leaving. I know kids always think it won't be me, but if a coach is turning over 25-40% of his roster from transfers as he is recruiting you or a year or 2 before you make your decision then you gotta know there is a good chance in the next couple years you could be next out the door. It just baffles me how many kids commit to a school shortly after a mass exodus of underclassman players via the transfer. I get your point, but Maryland got a lot better after a bunch of players transferred away. Sometimes it signals more of a change of direction for a coach, rather than an indictment against him I understand what it may signal on a grander scale (fans, alumni, media, Athletic Department, School Administration, etc) but I'm talking about from the prospects perspective who has only 4 years of eligibilty to get this right and limited rights as compared to coaches who if they leave don't have to sit out a year. To me as a prospect, watching a program have a mass exodus of players that staff has just recruited a year or two ago would make me extremely iffy trusting that staff with my best opportunities to be successful. Especially if I'm a prospect who has pro potential and I have several options in terms of schools/coaching staffs. I think I would lean heavily towards a coaching who's program has more stability in terms of keeping it's prospect vs a program that's recently become a revolving door.
|
|
swhoya
Golden Hoya (over 1000 posts)
Posts: 1,137
|
Post by swhoya on Mar 30, 2016 17:32:31 GMT -5
I wonder how landing Mulmore would impact our chances at landing Lykes. I don't think you can play the coaches can afford to play that game--if Mulmore wanted to be a Hoya, you take him (unless you knew that Lykes was yours to lose). But just an interesting question...which would you prefer?
|
|
hoyainspirit
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
When life puts that voodoo on me, music is my gris-gris.
Posts: 8,392
|
Post by hoyainspirit on Mar 30, 2016 17:36:28 GMT -5
Lykes, w/o a doubt for me.
|
|
Bigs"R"Us
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
Posts: 6,641
|
Post by Bigs"R"Us on Mar 30, 2016 17:56:50 GMT -5
They would only overlap for one year, so I don't think it factors in too much. I would much prefer four years of Lykes over two years of Mulmore.
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastteddy58 on Mar 30, 2016 18:07:45 GMT -5
|
|
Hoyas4Ever
Platinum Hoya (over 5000 posts)
A Wise Man Once Told Me Don't Argue With Fools....
Posts: 5,448
|
Post by Hoyas4Ever on Mar 31, 2016 1:30:27 GMT -5
I wonder how landing Mulmore would impact our chances at landing Lykes. I don't think you can play the coaches can afford to play that game--if Mulmore wanted to be a Hoya, you take him (unless you knew that Lykes was yours to lose). But just an interesting question...which would you prefer? I don't think landing Mulmore would impact Lykes recruitment in any way. Mulmore's game is versatile enough to slide over and play along side Lykes which would be ideal if Peak was to have a great season and move on to the association.
|
|