|
Post by showcase on Jan 30, 2004 10:04:59 GMT -5
I noted an article in the Post this morning re: the use of stem cells from aborted fetuses in research being conducted at GU. Personally, I think the university handled this rather appropriately, but it will be interesting to hear from those who are concerned with GU's Catholic tradition. From the article... An in-house investigation verified the claim. But when 14 of the researchers involved said that ending the use of the cells in question would jeopardize years of work and funding, the matter was turned over to ethicists. In a recommendation that scholars said could mark a first in Catholic medical research in the United States, Georgetown has decided to let those researchers continue their work.
The Rev. Kevin T. FitzGerald, a university bioethicist, said he reasoned that the scientists did not know the cells had come from aborted fetuses when they began their work and should not be forced to abandon potentially lifesaving studies or risk forfeiting grants. The benefits to society, he said, far outweigh the harm done by using the cells, because the abortions were not performed for the purpose of providing the cells to scientists.
"The ideal would be not to be involved with [aborted fetal cells] at all," said FitzGerald, a Jesuit priest who holds a doctorate in molecular genetics. "Obviously, we don't live in an ideal world. We do the best we can."www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61643-2004Jan29.html?nav=hptoc_m
|
|
hoyatables
Diamond Hoya (over 2500 posts)
Posts: 2,603
|
Post by hoyatables on Jan 30, 2004 15:37:18 GMT -5
I was quite impressed with the University's decision as well. I think they did a fine job of recognizing the complex moral and ethical issues involved here and balanced them fairly against the investment in and benefits from the research.
This was a fairly easy decision to make. What would be far more controversial would be an overturn of the ban on future stem cell use. (The decision to not permit future use was not all that surprising, given that the same medical center doesn't even distribute condoms or other birth control, let alone perform abortions.)
For a Catholic university (with, I believe, the approval of the archdiocese) to make this choice demonstrates a certain degree of maturity and recognition that some things just cannot be absolute. To me, it is far more questionable for the federal government to make the same kind of decision and "adopt" one moral view at the expense of the tremendous potential benefits that come from such research, but I suppose one could say that permitting all stem cell use would be adopting the alternative ethical standpoint.
It was nice to open the Post and be proud of my Alma Mater.
|
|